Sure, I added the label `release/4.16.2` and will include this PR, thanks Reid.
Thanks,
Hang
Reid Chan 于2023年6月15日周四 10:23写道：
>
> H teami,
>
> Is it ok to include this PR https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3813?
> There are 3 approvals
>
>
> ---
> Best Regards,
> R.C
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 14,
H teami,
Is it ok to include this PR https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3813?
There are 3 approvals
---
Best Regards,
R.C
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 4:28 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> +1
>
> Enrico
>
> Il Mer 14 Giu 2023, 09:35 Wenbing Shen ha
> scritto:
>
> > +10
> >
> > I notice
+1
Enrico
Il Mer 14 Giu 2023, 09:35 Wenbing Shen ha
scritto:
> +10
>
> I noticed https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3979 that issue was
> introduced in bookkeeper-4.16.0 by
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3847,
> and in pulsar-3.0. 0 version introduced bk-4.16.1.
>
>
+10
I noticed https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3979 that issue was
introduced in bookkeeper-4.16.0 by
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3847,
and in pulsar-3.0. 0 version introduced bk-4.16.1.
Our online business runs a pulsar-3.0.0 cluster, we and other pulsar-3.0.0
user
Hi everyone,
We have found one critical bug[1] in BookKeeper 4.16.1, and I would
like to discuss the starting 4.16.2 release to include some critical
bug fixes and improvements, such as [1] and [2]
Here are the PRs for 4.16.2:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3
