+1 thanks for taking care of this.
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 10:52 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> BookKeeper 4.16.6 was released on June 26th, 3 months ago, and I
> would like to discuss starting the 4.16.7 release to include some
> critical security and bug
Sounds good to me. This won't add any new risk.
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 4:30 PM Hang Chen wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I would like to discuss the potential backporting of a recently
> introduced feature from the BookKeeper 4.17.0 release to the 4.16.x
> bran
+1 binding
* Checked signatures
* Check localbookie and local perf tool
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 7:06 AM Hang Chen wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for version 4.16.0,
> as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 6:05 AM Hang Chen wrote:
> This is the vote for BP-62.
>
> ### Motivation
> The bookie server process add-entry requests pipeline:
> - Get one request from the Netty socket channel
> - Choose one thread to process the written req
+1 (binding)
Very good addition!
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 4:38 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Up
>
> We need 1 more binding vote from a PMC member
>
> Enrico
>
> Il Mar 27 Set 2022, 11:36 Nicolò Boschi ha scritto:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> &
/bookkeeper/issues/3322
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3260
--
--
Matteo Merli
+1
Verified:
* Checksums
* Building
* Starting standalone bookie
Thanks,
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 8:53 AM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The vote has been out for 5 days - any feedback?
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:08 PM Andrey Yegorov
Closing this vote with 3 binding and 2 non-binding +1s :
Binding +1s:
* Matteo
* Enrico
* Jia
Non-Binding +1s:
* Nicolò
* Andrey
Thanks everyone,
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 5:16 AM Jia Zhai wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - verified packages checksum an
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 2:27 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Matteo,
> Are you preparing the release notes ?
> Which are the contents of the release ?
Added PR for release notes:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2986
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
Thanks,
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:18 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Especially if we have to deliver the upgrade of log4j2
BK 4.14 is including log4j 1.2.x, which has other vulnerabilities,
though not the log4shell one.
There are few fixes in the 4.14 that would be good to release soon.
Given that the timeline for 4.15 can be quite long, I'd propose to
release one more patch release right now.
Let me know if there are other fixes to include.
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
+1
Verified:
* Checksums
* Building
* Starting standalone bookie
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 4:26 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - verified signatures and digests
> - built from source, on JDK8 + Ubuntu
> - verified Apache RAT check
>
+1
Verified:
* Checksums
* Building
* Starting standalone bookie
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 8:42 AM Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> I think if the issue with Java 11 is in that test, we shouldn't block
> the release as this was probably already there before.
I think if the issue with Java 11 is in that test, we shouldn't block
the release as this was probably already there before.
We should instead make sure the BK CI is using Java 11 to run the
tests, to avoid this kind of issue.
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 7:08 AM Yong
that this check is done before starting replicating
a ledger. If the copy process gets started, it will then continue
until done. A potential improvement here would be to even break the
copy of 1 ledger.
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 6:47 AM zhangao wrote:
>
> Maybe the
The vote is now closed and the release was approved with 6 +1s (4
binding and 2 non-binding);
Binding votes:
* Matteo
* Jia
* Sijie
* Enrico
Non-Binding votes:
* Yong
* Hang
Thank you.
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 5:47 AM hangc wrote:
>
> +1（non-b
/release-4.14.1-rc0
[5] f7a94422e44a7da6a5a8667853ad468bb0194642
Thank you,
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 6:00 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Before rushing to a release, isn't it better to wait for a couple of
> weeks in order to see
> if other people in the community find other problems on 4.14.0
As it is, the 4.14.0 release cannot be used by Pulsar. At the same
time, there are
included in the imminent Pulsar
2.8.0 release, I think we should release a patch ASAP in order to
unblock that release.
If there are no objections, I'll move forward with the patch release.
Thanks,
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
+1 (binding)
Checked:
* Signatures
* Source package structure, and compile
* Binary package
* Running standalone bookie and client
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 2:23 PM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
>
> I do not hear voices against it so I assume everyone is ok with this
Andrey, there are several PRs that would be good to get into 4.14. We
shouldn't just push everything out to 4.15.
Just a couple of examples:
* https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2710
* https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2698
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:
+1 We should do 4.14, carrying all the fixes that are there in master as well.
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 11:57 AM Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 2:22 AM Yunze Xu
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > About 10 days ago I found a heap memory
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 2:15 PM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri
wrote:
>
> > otherwise the write will timeout internally and it will get replayed to a
> new bookie.
> If Qa is met and the writes of Qw-Qa fail after we send the success to the
> client, why would the write replayed on a new bookie?
I think
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 8:27 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Hi Matteo,
> in this comment you are talking about an issue you saw when WQ is greater
> that AQ
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/2497#issuecomment-734423246
>
> IIUC you are saying that if one bookie is slow the client contin
+1 from me on Gradle.
The advantages in having very fast (and correct) incremental builds
are very nice.
I wouldn't expect major problems in setting up for Apache releases
since several other ASF projects are already using it.
Based on feedback on this, I'd also like to later start a similar
Gra
t; Checked signatures and checksums
> > Checked RAT/Spotbugs on JDK8
> > Built on JDK8 + Linux, run tests
> > Run "standalone" mode and localbookie (with JDK8)
> > Compared tarballs with 4.9.1 onces, no significant changes (I have used
> > 'meld')
>
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 6:47 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Here is a draft for BookKeeper board report of May. Please take a look.
>
> If there is no objections, I will submit it today.
>
> ---
>
>
> ## Description:
>
> BookKe
bookkeeper/tree/v4.9.2-rc0
--
Matteo Merli
If that's ok, then I'll start preparing for 4.9.2.
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:51 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Il ven 3 mag 2019, 19:01 Matteo Merli ha scritto:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I wanted to check for opinions on starting a BK 4.9.2
B closing https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2022
Complete list of changes currently marked for 4.9.2:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues?q=label%3Arelease%2F4.9.2+is%3Aclosed
Thoughts? Anything else that should go in?
--
Matteo Merli
Hi Enrico,
looked into it but haven't found root cause yet.
Please proceed with release.
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:43 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> News?
>
> Enrico
>
> Il lun 18 mar 2019, 17:18 Matteo Merli ha scritto:
>>
>> Thanks Enrico
Thanks Enrico for calling this out.
Let me try to get a fix today for this. Otherwise let's go ahead with 4.9.1.
Thanks,
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:01 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Matteo and Ivan,
> I see this issue marked for 4.9.1
> https://
+1 (binding)
(MacOS 10.14)
Verified:
* Signatures
* Source package build
* Binary with localbookie
* Client library jars in Maven
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:21 PM Jia Zhai wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Environment: macOS 10.14.2
>
>
> - verified 4 pa
Hi Enrico, thanks for pinging here. I'll take a look at it today.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 5:13 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Hi,
> today I am running all the tests on my laptop and I have got this errors
> I can file an issue, but I wanted to point them on the ML
>
> [INFO] Running org.apache.bo
+1
* Check binary, checksums, and ran a localbookie
* Source, checked rat and compiled with tests
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:53 AM Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version 4.7.3,
> as follows:
>
ry slow so not
to be useful in practice
--
Matteo Merli
producers consumers created by that instance.
--
Matteo Merli
git
> > > >> > sha ea072c8f8b9d20651b513036c09f264ca5c7ec6e
> > > >> >
> > > >> > BookKeeper's KEYS file contains PGP keys we used to sign this
> > release:
> > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bookkeeper/KEYS
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Please download these packages and review this release candidate:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > - Review release notes
> > > >> > - Download the source package (verify shasum, and asc) and follow
> > the
> > > >> > instructions to build and run the bookkeeper service.
> > > >> > - Download the binary package (verify shasum, and asc) and follow
> > the
> > > >> > instructions to run the bookkeeper service.
> > > >> > - Review maven repo, release tag, licenses, and any other things
> you
> > > >> think
> > > >> > it is important to a release.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> > majority
> > > >> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > Sijie Guo
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1628
> > > >> > [2]
> > > >> >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.7.2-rc0/
> > > >> > [3]
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1031/
> > > >> > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.7.2-rc0
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Matteo Merli
hat, after a operation is submitted to
> a ledger, it only ever operates on a single thread.
> If you look at LedgerHandle now, you have to jump around 4 files to
> deduce which thread methods like handleBookieFailure or
> sendAddSuccessCallbacks are called on, and even then you can't even be
> sure, so we wrap everything in synchronized when we don't really need
> to.
>
> -Ivan
>
--
Matteo Merli
gt; Thanks,
> > Sijie Guo
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1518
> > [2]
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.7.1-rc0/
> > [3]
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1030/
> > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.7.1-rc0
> >
>
--
Matteo Merli
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1330
> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/
> > bookkeeper-4.7.0-rc1/
> > [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapachebookkeeper-1029/
> > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.7.0
> >
> >
>
--
Matteo Merli
ar 24, 2018 at 11:16 AM Sijie Guo wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> > While profiling the allocations of a BookKeeper client (from current
> > master) writing entries, I've noticed that there are multiple allocations
> > per ent
k it might be worth to refactor OrderedScheduler or
OrderedSafeExecutor to avoid that overhead.
Thoughts?
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
nd
out potential issues before getting closer to Pulsar release timeline.
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
to call out Ivan Kelly & Jia Zhai for giving a big push of
porting many of the changes into BookKeeper and the BookKeeper community
for being very receptive and helpful in getting this load of changes back
into mainline.
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
ected block size (i don't think we
> queried the actual size), which would ensure that you didn't try to
> rewrite a block, which could corrupt data if you failed in the middle
> of a rewrite. Of course, there's no guarantee that these things are
> bug free, but they should have handled the situation you described.
>
> -Ivan
>
--
Matteo Merli
/4.5.1/overview/releaseNotes/
>
> We would like to thank the contributors that made the release possible.
>
> Regards,
>
> The BookKeeper Team
>
--
Matteo Merli
2yDyarL1%2Bf7AWB89NfUH3Ji35RZVaR-CmLYV16i-1RW%2BA8Lg%40mail.
> > gmail.com%3E
> >
> > But we never formally called a vote, so here's the vote.
> >
> > The bylaws don't actually cover votes like this, so lets use lazy
> > majority, active committers.
> >
> > -Ivan
> >
>
--
Matteo Merli
tp://eolivelli.blogspot.it/2017/09/herddb-distributed-jvm-embeddable.html
>
> The code is open source and you can find it as usual on GitHub
> https://github.com/diennea/herddb
>
> Any contribution will be welcome !
>
> Cheers
>
> Enrico Olivelli
>
--
Matteo Merli
feature misses a release we have a good idea of when it will
> > > show up.
> > > 3.
> > >
> > > Users know when to expect their features
> > > 3.
> > >
> > >Transparency - There will be a published cut-off date (AKA feature
> > >freeze) for the release and people will know about it in advance.
> > Hopefully
> > >this will remove the contention around which features make it.
> > >4.
> > >
> > >Quality - we've seen issues pop up in release candidates due to
> > >last-minute features that didn't have proper time to bake in. More
> > time
> > >between feature freeze and release will let us test more, document
> > more and
> > >resolve more issues.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Sijie
> > >
> >
> --
>
>
> -- Enrico Olivelli
>
--
Matteo Merli
apache/bookkeeper/pull/402
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/4.5.0-rc0/
> [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachebookkeeper-1012/
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.5.0
>
> --
> Jvrao
> ---
> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>
--
Matteo Merli
ache/bookkeeper/pull/402
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/4.5.0-rc0/
> [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachebookkeeper-1012/
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.5.0
>
> --
> Jvrao
> ---
> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
>
--
Matteo Merli
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> Enrico
>
> Il gio 27 lug 2017, 20:02 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
>
> > Start a vote thread for transferring the DL slack channel to BK.
> >
> > The propose is:
>
Sure, make sure to place it under the "content/" folder which is where
gitpubsub is expecting it to be.
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> I created a blank branch 'asf-site' for enabling gitpubsub for the new
> website. I am also g
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> Is there an apache "team" in slack? it would save having to have
> multiple teams open if a person is involved in multiple projects. This
> would be especially useful for people who use slack in the browser. It
> would also reduce the signup ba
That's true, though I would swear that it was working just a couple of
hours ago. :)
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Edward Ribeiro
wrote:
> FYI, the 'Documentation', 'Get Involved' and 'Project Info' drop down menus
> on https://b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16035662#comment-16035662
]
Matteo Merli commented on BOOKKEEPER-1091:
--
+1
> Remove Hedw
To add more context, this topic was discussed recently at ApacheCon.
See this talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWurOHvm5WM
Relevant portion start at 18:00.
In short, they are saying that the
ASF is trying to leverage Github more and more in the future.
Matteo
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:48 PM
+1
Having issues and PR in one tool is a great plus.
If this proposal is accepted, we should also ask INFRA to allow to assign
issues/PRs to committers/contributors and to create labels that fit our
workflow.
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:03 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
> My vote on this is +1.
>
> Simply
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1090:
Summary: Use LOG.isDebugEnabled() to avoid unexpected allocations
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1090
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1090
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16032422#comment-16032422
]
Matteo Merli commented on BOOKKEEPER-1071:
--
[~eolivelli] Sorry for dela
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Merli reassigned BOOKKEEPER-1071:
Assignee: Matteo Merli
> BookieRecoveryTest is failing due to a Net
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16015905#comment-16015905
]
Matteo Merli commented on BOOKKEEPER-1071:
--
Sure, looking a
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1069:
Summary: If client uses V2 proto, set the connection to always
decode V2 messages
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1069
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1069
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1068:
Summary: Expose ByteBuf in LedgerEntry to avoid data copy
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1068
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1068
Project: Bookkeeper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Merli resolved BOOKKEEPER-1048.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Issue resolved by merging pull request 139
[https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Merli resolved BOOKKEEPER-887.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
> Allow to use multiple bookie journ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Merli resolved BOOKKEEPER-1047.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Add missing error code in ZK setData return p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Merli resolved BOOKKEEPER-1063.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Use executure.execute() instead of submit() to avoid creat
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1067:
Summary: Add Prometheus stats provider
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1067
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1067
Project: Bookkeeper
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Merli resolved BOOKKEEPER-1065.
--
Resolution: Invalid
As commented on the github PR, the current behavior is correct
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1066:
Summary: Introduce GrowableArrayBlockingQueue
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1066
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1066
Project: Bookkeeper
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1065:
Summary: OrderedSafeExecutor should only have 1 thread per bucket
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1065
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1065
Project
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1064:
Summary: ConcurrentModificationException in
AuditorLedgerCheckerTest
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1064
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1064
Project
I think there has been some confusion. Some of us "met" last Thursday,
since it was 2 weeks from the previous call.
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:46 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> I have just created the wiki page for next meeting
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2017-5-11+Me
of active journal files that won't get updated but read
>>> for long time?
>>>
>>
>> I am a bit confused about this question here. When talking about
>> durability, entry log files and journal files should be same, right?
>>
>>
>>
&
My understanding is that fsync() forces the IO on the metadata even if the
file size has not changed, for example to update the access timestamp.
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:47 PM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri
wrote:
> Let me try to consolidate the discussion.
>
> 1. We need to flush the metadata whene
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1063:
Summary: Use executure.execute() instead of submit() to avoid
creation of unused FutureTask
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1063
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16005502#comment-16005502
]
Matteo Merli commented on BOOKKEEPER-1062:
--
Example from
h
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1062:
Summary: AuditorLedgerCheckerTest intermittent failures
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1062
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1062
Project: Bookkeeper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Merli resolved BOOKKEEPER-1054.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Issue resolved by merging pull request 144
[https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Merli resolved BOOKKEEPER-1059.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Issue resolved by merging pull request 147
[https
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1061:
Summary: BookieWatcher should not do ZK blocking operations from
ZK async callback thread
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1061
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1061
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Merli resolved BOOKKEEPER-1060.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Issue resolved by merging pull request 148
[https
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1060:
Summary: Add utility to use SafeRunnable from Java8 Lambda
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1060
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1060
Project: Bookkeeper
and
> in GarbageCollectorThread.doCompactEntryLogs codepath. Here we just keep
> adding entries to the EntryLogger.logChannel and flush it before deleting
> the compacted entrylog.
>
> Thanks,
> Charan
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Matteo Merli
> wrote
> On the other hand, a change to the file size (st_size, as made by say
ftruncate(2)), would require a metadata flush."
This is why the Journal is pre-allocating the blocks instead of just
appending entries at the end of the file.
That way the metadata is only synced each time you expand a block
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1059:
Summary: Upgrade to SLF4J-1.7.25
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1059
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1059
Project: Bookkeeper
Issue Type
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1058:
Summary: Ignore already deleted ledger on replication audit
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1058
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1058
Project
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1057:
Summary: Do not log error message after read failure in
PendingReadOp
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1057
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1057
Project
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1056:
Summary: Removed PacketHeader serialization/deserialization
allocation
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1056
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1056
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1055:
Summary: Optimize handling of masterKey in case it is empty
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1055
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1055
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Merli resolved BOOKKEEPER-1053.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Issue resolved by merging pull request 143
[https
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1054:
Summary: Add gitignore file
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1054
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1054
Project: Bookkeeper
Issue Type: Task
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1053:
Summary: Upgrade RAT maven version to 0.12 and ignore Eclipse
project files
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1053
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1053
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Merli resolved BOOKKEEPER-1052.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Issue resolved by merging pull request 142
[https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Merli resolved BOOKKEEPER-1051.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Issue resolved by merging pull request 141
[https
Matteo Merli created BOOKKEEPER-1052:
Summary: Print autorecovery enabled or not in bookie shell
Key: BOOKKEEPER-1052
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1052
Project: Bookkeeper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16003478#comment-16003478
]
Matteo Merli commented on BOOKKEEPER-1050:
--
{noformat}
co
1 - 100 of 392 matches
Mail list logo
