Re: Cutting BookKeeper 4.13.1 or 4.14.0 release?

2021-05-05 Thread Andrey Yegorov
Lari and I have looked at the Netty upgrade. There are some test breaks, and so far everything is related to behavior changes related to TLS 1.3, see https://stackoverflow.com/a/62465859 We managed to fix some of the issues https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2696 but "the client won't know w

Re: Cutting BookKeeper 4.13.1 or 4.14.0 release?

2021-05-05 Thread Henry Saputra
I am +1 for having next release as 4.14.0 - Henry On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 2:51 PM Andrey Yegorov wrote: > Overall +1 for 4.14.0 - the milestone is due May 16th anyway. > There is nothing that breaks compatibility with 4.13 so we can skip 4.13.1. > > One thing I'd love to see in 4.14 is > https:/

Re: Running without journal

2021-05-05 Thread Jack Vanlightly
I have created BP-44 for this proposal. Regarding Flavio's questions, we can address those during the review process and Ivan can chip in regarding the performance aspects. https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/2705 https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2706 Jack On Wed, May 5, 2021 a

Re: Running without journal

2021-05-05 Thread Lothruin Mirwen
Great news! I'm so excited to see it at work :) Diego Il giorno mar 4 mag 2021 alle ore 20:38 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri < jujj...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > how you justify removing the ledger as opposed to removing the ledger > storage and preserving the journal > > I will be waiting for the BP