On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 2:29 PM Matteo Merli wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 2:15 PM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri
> wrote:
> >
> > > otherwise the write will timeout internally and it will get replayed
> to a
> > new bookie.
> > If Qa is met and the writes of Qw-Qa fail after we send the success to
>
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 2:15 PM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri
wrote:
>
> > otherwise the write will timeout internally and it will get replayed to a
> new bookie.
> If Qa is met and the writes of Qw-Qa fail after we send the success to the
> client, why would the write replayed on a new bookie?
I think
> otherwise the write will timeout internally and it will get replayed to a
new bookie.
If Qa is met and the writes of Qw-Qa fail after we send the success to the
client, why would the write replayed on a new bookie?
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 1:47 PM Matteo Merli wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 8:2
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 8:27 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Hi Matteo,
> in this comment you are talking about an issue you saw when WQ is greater
> that AQ
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/2497#issuecomment-734423246
>
> IIUC you are saying that if one bookie is slow the client contin
Hi Matteo,
in this comment you are talking about an issue you saw when WQ is greater
that AQ
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/2497#issuecomment-734423246
IIUC you are saying that if one bookie is slow the client continues to
accumulate references to the entries that still have not recei
