Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

2018-04-16 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Great news ! I will be happy to switch to the new API soon ! Thank you very much to everyone and particularly to Sijie for getting this great release out ! Enrico 2018-04-17 8:45 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo : > I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. > > There are 4 appro

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

2018-04-16 Thread Sijie Guo
I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. There are 4 approving votes, 4 of which are binding: * Enrico Olivelli * Jia Zhai * Matteo Merli * Sijie Guo There are no disapproving votes. Thanks everyone! - Sijie On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

2018-04-16 Thread Matteo Merli
+1 Checked: * Src and bin distribution * Checked signatures, checksums * License and Notice * Compiled and ran test in Pulsar with this RC version Matteo On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:42 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > +1 from me as well. > > - packages (both source & binary) are good. shasum, asc are g

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

2018-04-16 Thread Sijie Guo
+1 from me as well. - packages (both source & binary) are good. shasum, asc are good - source package can compile and run localbookie - binary package can run localbookie and bookie shell - deploy the package into gcp and aws and run a load test over the weekend. all is good - Sijie On Fri, Apr

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

2018-04-16 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 - GPG signatures look good - Run tests locally from source archive, all okay apart from a know test which always fail on my laptop (already reported https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/1019). - Run tests on several projects without problems - Run the candidate on my 'famous' cluster wit