We could have a VOTE.
But, I think there iff there is no concern or main objection from DISCUSS
thread, we could move to Github via Gtibox without VOTE.
Once done, we just need to do official ANNOUNCE to make sure dev@ at
bookkeeper and dost-log knows about the changes and what to expect.
I am +
Last thursday, we a had a short discussion about possibly changing the
merge process to allow unsquashed commits and the use of the github
merge button. One sticking point is that we'd like an automatic way
to enforce some commit message metadata requirements and formatting.
Git lets you define s
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri
wrote:
> Can we have a doc to put all these things? Thread has grown enough to cause
> confusion.
I created a github project earlier today. We can manage the different
streams of work from there. Each stream should have a doc though.
https:
I like this too.
I have no time immediately for working on this sorry.
Maybe the only blocker isse is about the boot with empty dirs which Sijie
pointed
Enrico
Il lun 9 ott 2017, 19:08 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
> +1. I liked this summary.
>
> JV, is this related to what you were writing? or anyone
+1
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:08 AM Sijie Guo wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > We discussed this in
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bookkeeper-dev/201710.mbox/ajax/%
> > 3CCAO2yDyarL1%2Bf7AWB89NfUH3Ji35RZVaR-CmLYV16i-1RW%2BA
+1
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We discussed this in
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bookkeeper-dev/201710.mbox/ajax/%
> 3CCAO2yDyarL1%2Bf7AWB89NfUH3Ji35RZVaR-CmLYV16i-1RW%2BA8Lg%40mail.
> gmail.com%3E
>
> But we never formally called a vote, so he
+1. I liked this summary.
JV, is this related to what you were writing? or anyone else want to drive
this?
- Sijie
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri
wrote:
> Can we have a doc to put all these things? Thread has grown enough to cause
> confusion.
>
> Immediate things.
>
+1
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> My vote is a +1
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> > I forgot the timeframe. The deadline to vote is midday UTC, on
> > Thursday 12th October.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> >> Hi fol
Can we have a doc to put all these things? Thread has grown enough to cause
confusion.
Immediate things.
1. Don't assume new bookie if journal dir is empty.
2. Put cookies through bookie format, and bookie never boots on an empty
cookie or mismatched cookie.
3. We can live with operations procedur
On Oct 9, 2017 1:54 AM, "Ivan Kelly" wrote:
Hi folks,
I was travelling over the weekend, so I didn't have a chance to reply
to anything on this thread. First off, as Enrico said, there's a lot
of different topics being discussed at once. Perhaps each should be
broken into a github issue, and the
On Oct 9, 2017 1:13 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" wrote:
2017-10-09 9:21 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo :
> okay, but why do you want to track the list of files? I don't get your
idea
> here.
>
If you allow a bookie to start with a journal directory which contains the
cookie file but without the other files the
>> In any case, why not instead of refusing to start if any ledgers
>> reference the bookie, on boot the bookie checks which ledgers it is
>> supposed to have,
>
> How can you do this without querying the big oracle? You can use the local
> view as source of truth. Maybe I am missing one piece
Sor
Il lun 9 ott 2017, 10:54 Ivan Kelly ha scritto:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was travelling over the weekend, so I didn't have a chance to reply
> to anything on this thread. First off, as Enrico said, there's a lot
> of different topics being discussed at once. Perhaps each should be
> broken into a github
My vote is a +1
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> I forgot the timeframe. The deadline to vote is midday UTC, on
> Thursday 12th October.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> We discussed this in
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbo
I forgot the timeframe. The deadline to vote is midday UTC, on
Thursday 12th October.
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We discussed this in
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bookkeeper-dev/201710.mbox/ajax/%3CCAO2yDyarL1%2Bf7AWB89NfUH3Ji35RZVaR-CmLYV16i
+1
-- Enrico
2017-10-09 11:16 GMT+02:00 Ivan Kelly :
> Hi folks,
>
> We discussed this in
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bookkeeper-dev/201710.mbox/ajax/%
> 3CCAO2yDyarL1%2Bf7AWB89NfUH3Ji35RZVaR-CmLYV16i-1RW%2BA8Lg%40mail.
> gmail.com%3E
>
> But we never formally called a vote, so her
Hi folks,
We discussed this in
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bookkeeper-dev/201710.mbox/ajax/%3CCAO2yDyarL1%2Bf7AWB89NfUH3Ji35RZVaR-CmLYV16i-1RW%2BA8Lg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
But we never formally called a vote, so here's the vote.
The bylaws don't actually cover votes like this, so lets
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Do you have plans for creating a web ui?
AFAIK, there are no plans for a web ui. The http stuff is to allow a
thin client, and nothing else.
I could be wrong though.
-Ivan
Hi folks,
I was travelling over the weekend, so I didn't have a chance to reply
to anything on this thread. First off, as Enrico said, there's a lot
of different topics being discussed at once. Perhaps each should be
broken into a github issue, and then we can continue each conversation
there, as
2017-10-09 9:21 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo :
> okay, but why do you want to track the list of files? I don't get your idea
> here.
>
If you allow a bookie to start with a journal directory which contains the
cookie file but without the other files the bookie thinks that have been
persisted durably you
okay, but why do you want to track the list of files? I don't get your idea
here.
- Sijie
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> 2017-10-09 7:52 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo :
>
> > On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Enrico Olivelli
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Il sab 7 ott 2017, 00:27 Sijie Gu
21 matches
Mail list logo
