Thanks a lot Enrico and Sijie for your comments and information on this.
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Great to see you working on this !
> I would be great to have such feature, as it is the first step to a
> 'standalone' BookKeeper mode
>
> Some complementary ideas/f
On mar 5 set 2017, 21:28 Sijie Guo wrote:
> Enrico,
>
> Thank you for your feedback.
>
> Just FYI - this BP is the first part of the work that we've been working on
> improving metadata management on BookKeeper. We are doing this in three
> parts:
>
> - thin client : avoid talking to metadata sto
Enrico,
Thank you for your feedback.
Just FYI - this BP is the first part of the work that we've been working on
improving metadata management on BookKeeper. We are doing this in three
parts:
- thin client : avoid talking to metadata store directly in clients, moving
the metadata management to t
Great to see you working on this !
I would be great to have such feature, as it is the first step to a
'standalone' BookKeeper mode
Some complementary ideas/first look questions:
- the document does not talk about security, IMHO we have at least to cover
authentication and TLS, it would be great t
Hi all,
I have just posted a proposal to remove zookeeper dependency from
bookkeeper client, to make bookkeeper client a thin client:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/BP-16%3A+remove+zookeeper+dependency+from+bookkeeper+client
BookKeeper uses zookeeper for service discover
