[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #194: Issue 184: Support GitHub issues in bk-merge script

Github user jiazhai commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/194 cool --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the fe

Re: Bookie labels and Placement policy

Il mer 24 mag 2017, 21:49 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri < > jujj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We have this use case too. I believe introducing "pools" Is the right > > approach for this. > > Pools are very high level abstraction and it is treated

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1097) GC test when no WritableDirs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16054617#comment-16054617 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1097: Github user eolivelli commen

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #188: BOOKKEEPER-1097: GC test when no WritableDirs

Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/188 @reddycharan the patch is ok. I think @sijie will try merge current patch list in the best order --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1097) GC test when no WritableDirs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16054605#comment-16054605 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1097: Github user reddycharan comm

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #188: BOOKKEEPER-1097: GC test when no WritableDirs

Github user reddycharan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/188 Thanks. I think this commit should be good to go. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1033) Handle DirsPartitionDuplication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16054604#comment-16054604 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1033: Github user reddycharan comm

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #189: BOOKKEEPER-1033: Handle DirsPartitionDuplication

Github user reddycharan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/189 @sijie @eolivelli anymore comments/concerns? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1034) When all disks are full, start Bookie in RO mode if RO mode is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16054603#comment-16054603 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1034: Github user reddycharan comm

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #190: BOOKKEEPER-1034: Bookie start in RO when diskfull

Github user reddycharan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/190 @sijie if you dont have anymore comments, I can fix the tailing spaces and send new CR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub

Build failed in Jenkins: bookkeeper-master #1789

See -- [...truncated 768.04 KB...] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 8.086 sec - in org.apache.bookkeeper.test.MultipleThreadReadTest Running org.apache.bo