Build failed in Jenkins: bookkeeper-master-git-pullrequest #291

See Changes: [cguttapalem] BOOKKEEPER-1028: inc/excl opts listunderreplicated [cguttapalem] BOOKKEEPER-1029: BookieDecommision Workflow -- [...truncated 2

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1028) inc/excl opts listunderreplicate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15961688#comment-15961688 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1028: GitHub user reddycharan open

[GitHub] bookkeeper pull request #127: BOOKKEEPER-1028 and BOOKKEEPER-1029

GitHub user reddycharan opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/127 BOOKKEEPER-1028 and BOOKKEEPER-1029 BOOKKEEPER-1028: inc/excl opts listunderreplicated - Introduce including and excluding BookieId options for listunderreplicate

[jira] [Created] (BOOKKEEPER-1029) BookieDecommision Workflow

Charan Reddy Guttapalem created BOOKKEEPER-1029: --- Summary: BookieDecommision Workflow Key: BOOKKEEPER-1029 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1029 Project: Bookkeeper

[jira] [Created] (BOOKKEEPER-1028) inc/excl opts listunderreplicate

Charan Reddy Guttapalem created BOOKKEEPER-1028: --- Summary: inc/excl opts listunderreplicate Key: BOOKKEEPER-1028 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1028 Project: Bookke

Build failed in Jenkins: bookkeeper-master-git-pullrequest #290

See Changes: [sijie] BOOKKEEPER-997: Wire protocol change for supporting long poll [sijie] Add generated protobuf class [sijie] add more comments -- [...

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1027) Cleanup main README and main website page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15960973#comment-15960973 ] Matteo Merli commented on BOOKKEEPER-1027: -- +1 We should also consider using

Build failed in Jenkins: bookkeeper-master-git-pullrequest #289

See Changes: [govindappumenon] BOOKKEEPER-1018: Allow client to select older V2 protocol (no protobuf) -- [...truncated 24.35 KB...] Running org.apache.bo

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-1027) Cleanup main README and main website page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Enrico Olivelli updated BOOKKEEPER-1027: Summary: Cleanup main README and main website page (was: Cleanup main README)

Project Main Readme update

I have just created this minor issue to update the main README of the project https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1027 It's trivial but newbies will see that file as presentation of the code https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper In general I would like to clean up things in order to

[jira] [Created] (BOOKKEEPER-1027) Cleanup main README

Enrico Olivelli created BOOKKEEPER-1027: --- Summary: Cleanup main README Key: BOOKKEEPER-1027 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1027 Project: Bookkeeper Issue Type: Ta

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1018) Allow client to select older V2 protocol (no protobuf)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15960891#comment-15960891 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1018: Github user govind-menon com

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #126: BOOKKEEPER-1018: Allow client to select older V2 prot...

Github user govind-menon commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/126 @eolivelli @sijie Comments addressed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-391) Support Kerberos authentication of bookkeeper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15960887#comment-15960887 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-391: --- Github user eolivelli commented

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #110: BOOKKEEPER-391 Support Kerberos authentication of boo...

Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/110 @revans2 thanks for the review. I will address all of the comments next week and update the patch. I do not need MD5 for my projects/in production so I can drop it, honestly I have

Build failed in Jenkins: bookkeeper-master #1711

See -- [...truncated 22.71 KB...] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5.98 sec - in org.apache.bookkeeper.test.AsyncLedgerOpsTest Running org.apache.bookkeep

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-391) Support Kerberos authentication of bookkeeper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15960590#comment-15960590 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-391: --- Github user eolivelli commented

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #110: BOOKKEEPER-391 Support Kerberos authentication of boo...

Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/110 @revans2 can you take a look at this patch ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-391) Support Kerberos authentication of bookkeeper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15960589#comment-15960589 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on BOOKKEEPER-391: [~hustlmsp] during a communit

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1018) Allow client to select older V2 protocol (no protobuf)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15960392#comment-15960392 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1018: Github user eolivelli commen

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #126: BOOKKEEPER-1018: Allow client to select older V2 prot...

Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/126 I'm sorry I have missed some LOG.info lines Maybe can you @govind-menon remove them or change to 'debug' level ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have