https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/33921 is CP for release 2.63.0
This should be CPed so tests which emit newly introduced BoundedTrie are
skipped on Dataflow runner as the service does not process this new metric
type.
Thank you.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 8:30 AM Danny McCormick
wrote:
> Here i
lease branch after the feature PR was reverted
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:44 AM Rohit Sinha via dev
> wrote:
>
>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/33921 is CP for release 2.63.0
>> This should be CPed so tests which emit newly introduced BoundedTrie are
>> skip
the CPs.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 8:50 AM Jack McCluskey via dev <
>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The feature reversion (https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/33935) is
>>>> already in, do we
+1 (non-binding). Tested Java SDK with batch, streaming pipelines both on
legacy and runner_V2.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:36 AM Jan Lukavský wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Tested Java SDK with Flink Runner.
>
> Jan
> On 2/12/25 19:46, XQ Hu via dev wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding). Tested the Python S
I created three gsoc2025 project ideas:
1. https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/33980
2. https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/33981
3. https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/33982
I added the label gsoc but github says it can't be added. Does anyone know
whats going on?
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 6
-1 (non binding)
Lineage integration tests on 2.64 release are failing on Dataflow runner
which will break customer with lineage on Dataflow runner on 2.64.
Debugging for root cause ongoing.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:15 AM XQ Hu via dev wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) Tested this with a simple Data
Updated vote for RC2: +1 (non-binding)
All tests are passing now.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 5:08 PM Chamikara Jayalath
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Validated by running several pipelines that use managed transforms and
> multi-language.
>
> - Cham
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:43 AM XQ Hu via d