+1 (non-binding). Tested this with a Dataflow ML pipeline:
https://github.com/google/dataflow-ml-starter/actions/runs/11941508662/job/33286504851
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 3:35 PM Danny McCormick via dev
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version 2.6
+1
Validated using the RC2 but the diff seems minimal.
Thanks,
Cham
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 1:22 PM XQ Hu via dev wrote:
> +1 (non-binding). Tested this with a Dataflow ML pipeline:
> https://github.com/google/dataflow-ml-starter/actions/runs/11941508662/job/33286504851
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 202
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version 2.61.0,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release
candidate, and vote +1 if no i
Another regression was found when using the flink job server container
image. This can be observed in the Python Flink load tests [1]. I will move
to RC3, I already have a cherry-pick prepared to fix the problem [2].
Thanks XQ and Yi for catching/fixing this!
Thanks,
Danny
[1] https://github.com/
+1 (binding)
Tested Java SDK with Flink Runner.
Jan
On 11/19/24 17:11, XQ Hu via dev wrote:
+1 (non-binding). Tested this with a simple Dataflow ML job
(https://github.com/google/dataflow-ml-starter/actions/runs/11915579645/job/33206160169).
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 9:01 PM Danny McCormick v
This is your daily summary of Beam's current high priority issues that may need
attention.
See https://beam.apache.org/contribute/issue-priorities for the meaning and
expectations around issue priorities.
Unassigned P1 Issues:
https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32997 [Bug]: Non Retained
