Beam High Priority Issue Report (55)

This is your daily summary of Beam's current high priority issues that may need attention. See https://beam.apache.org/contribute/issue-priorities for the meaning and expectations around issue priorities. Unassigned P1 Issues: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32832 [Failing Test]: Pre

Re: [PROPOSAL] Re-release vendor grpc

Thanks! Nice work. On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 3:31 PM XQ Hu via dev wrote: > Thanks a lot, Yi! > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 3:25 PM Yi Hu via dev wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I would like to volunteer to rerelease the Beam vendored grpc 1.60.1. >> The grpc version will be unchanged but protobuf s

Re: [PR] Publish docs for 2.60.0 release [beam-site]

Abacn merged PR #671: URL: https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/671 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@beam.apache.org

Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.60.0, release candidate #2

Hi everyone, I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. There are 7 approving votes, 4 of which are binding ( https://lists.apache.org/thread/dvj53yf5k7lnrnczjssrz8tfgp8s12gl): * Ahmet Altay * Valentyn Tymofieiev * Jan Lukavský * Robert Burke There are no disapprov

Re: [PR] Publish docs for 2.60.0 release [beam-site]

Abacn commented on PR #671: URL: https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/671#issuecomment-2420335132 R: @lostluck -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsub

[VOTE][vendor-grpc] Vendored Dependencies Release

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for beam-vendor-grpc-1_60_1 version 0.3, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * the offi

Re: [QUESTION] about CsvIO

Adding @Yi Hu who might know more about the expected behavior. If you see a gap, feel free to fix it with a PR. And thank you for your contributions! On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 12:06 AM LDesire wrote: > In the CsvIO.parseRows method, does it matter if the number of CSV headers > is not the same as