Re: [VOTE] Release 2.60.0, release candidate #2

+1 (binding) Tested Flink Runner with java SDK.  Jan On 10/16/24 01:35, Valentyn Tymofieiev via dev wrote: +1 (binding), checked dataflow containers and ran a few Python pipelines. On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 4:22 PM Ahmet Altay via dev wrote: +1 (binding) On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 4:1

Beam High Priority Issue Report (54)

This is your daily summary of Beam's current high priority issues that may need attention. See https://beam.apache.org/contribute/issue-priorities for the meaning and expectations around issue priorities. Unassigned P1 Issues: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32794 The PostCommit Pyth

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.60.0, release candidate #2

+1 (non-binding) Tested DataflowTemplates integration test ( https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/DataflowTemplates/pull/1938). Also tested Java+Python Quickstart+mobile game walkthrough on Direct runner and Dataflow runner. On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 3:45 AM Jan Lukavský wrote: > +1 (binding) >

[PROPOSAL] Re-release vendor grpc

Hi everyone, I would like to volunteer to rerelease the Beam vendored grpc 1.60.1. The grpc version will be unchanged but protobuf sources will be excluded from the jar, addressing [1]. My plan is to follow the release process [2, 3], which involves preparing for the release, building a candidat

Re: [PROPOSAL] Re-release vendor grpc

Thanks a lot, Yi! On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 3:25 PM Yi Hu via dev wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to volunteer to rerelease the Beam vendored grpc 1.60.1. The > grpc version will be unchanged but protobuf sources will be excluded from > the jar, addressing [1]. > > My plan is to follow the

Re: Apache Beam Java Lib and ANTLR

HI @Yi Hu - Do you know the answer to this question? And if it is not vendored, should it be? On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 5:17 PM XQ Hu wrote: > I do not think ANLTR is vendored. +Yi here. > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 4:35 PM Reuven Lax wrote: > >> Is our usage of ANLTR not vendored? >> >> On Wed, Oc

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.60.0, release candidate #2

Thanks for catching these. Checked that > Prism artifacts as the Github Release wasn't published or updated with the latest RC tag. was due to https://github.com/apache/beam/actions/runs/11321090196 failed to stage prism. Rerun the workflow and the issue resolved. > It's also missing the blog

ML for Beam YAML design proposal

Hi all, As the Beam ML and Beam YAML frameworks and communities continue to grow, there is a great opportunity to link these two together by introducing ML capabilities to Beam YAML. By integrating ML capabilities into Beam YAML, we can dramatically simplify the development and deployment of machi

Re: Apache Beam Java Lib and ANTLR

I inspected the java core artifact and confirm that Beam's usage of antlr is vendored, in principle it should not leak antlr runtime class dependencies. Specifically, I checked that only java-core used antlr, and the classes are relocated: https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/1e279788027ffa031f634a

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.60.0, release candidate #2

+1 (binding) I have validated the prism release artifacts for linux-amd64, and that they work with the Python and Java SDK starters. I've also looked over and found a typo in the 2.60.0 blog post. Thanks Yi! Robert Burke On 2024/10/16 17:47:51 Yi Hu via dev wrote: > Thanks for catching these. C

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.60.0, release candidate #2

-1 (binding) Unable to validate Prism artifacts as the Github Release wasn't published or updated with the latest RC tag. https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/contributor-docs/release-guide.md#update-the-github-release-with-the-blog-post-content It looks like the RC1 github release page ex