Beam High Priority Issue Report (40)

2023-02-10 Thread beamactions
This is your daily summary of Beam's current high priority issues that may need attention. See https://beam.apache.org/contribute/issue-priorities for the meaning and expectations around issue priorities. Unassigned P1 Issues: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/25140 [Bug]: GenerateSequ

Beam Website Feedback

2023-02-10 Thread Julian Ogando via dev
Hi, I'm reading the documentation found in https://beam.apache.org/documentation/pipelines/test-your-pipeline/ from apache_beam.testing.test_pipeline import TestPipelinefrom apache_beam.testing.util import assert_thatfrom apache_beam.testing.util import equal_to class CountTest(unittest.TestCase):

Re: Beam Website Feedback

2023-02-10 Thread Anand Inguva via dev
Some of the imports are missing. ``` # try importing import unittest import apache_beam as beam # rest of the code. ``` try running with pytest as *pytest test.py *and it should work. Thanks, Anand On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:09 AM Julian Ogando via dev wrote: > Hi, > I'm reading the documenta

Re: Beam Website Feedback

2023-02-10 Thread Bruno Volpato via dev
Hi Julian, That's a good point. I think the focus of https://beam.apache.org/documentation/pipelines/test-your-pipeline/ is showing how to test Beam, but probably linking to working examples would be helpful to reduce friction. Related to your code, I believe you are missing 2 imports: import un

[VOTE] Release 2.45.0, Release Candidate #1

2023-02-10 Thread John Casey via dev
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version 2.45.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release candidate, and vote +1 if no

Re: Beam Website Feedback

2023-02-10 Thread Julian Ogando via dev
Hi Bruno, Thanks for the quick response! Yes, I already have the code running by reading the "unittest" documentation, but it would be good to include those changes in the Beam documentation :) Thanks! Julian On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:28 PM Bruno Volpato wrote: > > Hi Julian, > > That's a good

Re: Beam Website Feedback

2023-02-10 Thread Danny McCormick via dev
I just added https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/25425 to do this On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:42 AM Julian Ogando via dev wrote: > Hi Bruno, > Thanks for the quick response! > Yes, I already have the code running by reading the "unittest" > documentation, but it would be good to include those cha

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.45.0, Release Candidate #1

2023-02-10 Thread John Casey via dev
Addendum to above email. Java artifacts were built with Gradle 7.5.1 and OpenJDK 1.8.0_362 On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:14 AM John Casey wrote: > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version 2.45.0, > as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.45.0, Release Candidate #1

2023-02-10 Thread Luke Cwik via dev
+1 Validated release artifact signatures and verified the Java Flink and Spark quickstarts. On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 9:27 AM John Casey via dev wrote: > Addendum to above email. > > Java artifacts were built with Gradle 7.5.1 and OpenJDK 1.8.0_362 > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:14 AM John Casey

Re: A user-deployable Beam Transform Service

2023-02-10 Thread Robert Bradshaw via dev
Thanks. I added some comments to the doc. On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 1:33 PM Chamikara Jayalath via dev wrote: > > Hi All, > > Beam PTransforms are currently primarily identified as operations in a > pipeline that perform specific tasks. PTransform implementations were > traditionally linked to spe

Re: A user-deployable Beam Transform Service

2023-02-10 Thread Luke Cwik via dev
Seems like a useful thing to me and will make it easier for Beam users overall. On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 3:56 PM Robert Bradshaw via dev wrote: > Thanks. I added some comments to the doc. > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 1:33 PM Chamikara Jayalath via dev > wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > Beam PTransfo

Re: Beam SQL Alias issue while using With Clause

2023-02-10 Thread Andrew Pilloud via dev
I have a test case that I believe should reproduce this on both head and 2.43 but it ends up with a different logical plan. Can you provide your input types? We have a class of issues around compex types https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/19009 I don't believe the "LogicalFilter(condition=[=($2