Re: Slack Invites

2017-05-04 Thread Davor Bonaci
t; > > > > > My understanding is that if you use something like that plugin, and > > they > > > > detect it, Slack will ban you from new invites entirely or otherwise > > > punish > > > > you. They want this friction for free projects so that there

Re: Slack Invites

2017-05-04 Thread Vladisav Jelisavcic
understanding is that if you use something like that plugin, and > they > > > detect it, Slack will ban you from new invites entirely or otherwise > > punish > > > you. They want this friction for free projects so that there's pressure > > to > > > p

Re: Slack Invites

2017-05-04 Thread Jason Kuster
; > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Jesse Anderson < > je...@bigdatainstitute.io> > > wrote: > > > > > Is possible to change how Slack invites are handled? This might > encourage > > > our community contributions. > > > > > > Righ

Re: Slack Invites

2017-05-04 Thread Eric Anderson
use something like that plugin, and they > detect it, Slack will ban you from new invites entirely or otherwise punish > you. They want this friction for free projects so that there's pressure to > pay. > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Jesse Anderson > wrote: > > &g

Re: Slack Invites

2017-05-04 Thread Dan Halperin
> Is possible to change how Slack invites are handled? This might encourage > our community contributions. > > Right now, people have to email in (causing extra dev@/user@ emails). I > did > a quick search and found this <https://github.com/rauchg/slackin> so > people >

Slack Invites

2017-05-04 Thread Jesse Anderson
Is possible to change how Slack invites are handled? This might encourage our community contributions. Right now, people have to email in (causing extra dev@/user@ emails). I did a quick search and found this <https://github.com/rauchg/slackin> so people can invite themselves. Thanks,