There's enough concern over the data loss bug that an RC3 is warranted.
This vote is now closed, I'll send another one out once the new RC is
ready. Feel free to continue validations on RC2.
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 12:35 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> +1 to cherrypicking and creagtin a new RC
>
> On
+1 to cherrypicking and creagtin a new RC
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 4:03 AM Ahmet Altay via dev
wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/26521 was a severe issue. Should we
> cherry pick the fix (https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/26503) and build
> an RC3? (/cc @Reuven Lax @John Casey
> )
https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/26521 was a severe issue. Should we
cherry pick the fix (https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/26503) and build
an RC3? (/cc @Reuven Lax @John Casey
)
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:01 PM Jack McCluskey via dev
wrote:
> I have just now realized I didn't replace the
I have just now realized I didn't replace the release version or RC number
from the template's first line in either vote email. Oops. To be clear this
is 2.47.0 RC2
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 1:58 PM Jack McCluskey
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the
