Re: [DISCUSS] Provide MultimapUserStateHandler interface in StateRequestHandlers

2023-02-24 Thread Alan Zhang
ach SDK is a different matter though. > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 12:57 PM Alan Zhang wrote: > >> Appreciate it if anyone can help confirm and share thoughts. >> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:46 PM Alan Zhang wrote: >> >>> Hi Beam devs. >>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Provide MultimapUserStateHandler interface in StateRequestHandlers

2023-02-24 Thread Alan Zhang
Appreciate it if anyone can help confirm and share thoughts. On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:46 PM Alan Zhang wrote: > Hi Beam devs. > > According to the Fn State API design doc[1], the state type > MultimapUserState is intended for supporting MapState/SetState. And the > implementat

[DISCUSS] Provide MultimapUserStateHandler interface in StateRequestHandlers

2023-02-22 Thread Alan Zhang
Hi Beam devs. According to the Fn State API design doc[1], the state type MultimapUserState is intended for supporting MapState/SetState. And the implementation[2] for this state type is ready on the SDK harness side. Each runner will be responsible for integrating it if they want to leverage it.

MapState/SetState(aka, MultimapUserState) are not fully supported in Beam portability framework?

2023-01-24 Thread Alan Zhang via dev
the user state support is one of the gaps. The classic Samza runner support 5 major user state types: ValueState, BagState, CombingState, MapState and SetState, while the existing portable Samza runner only supports ValueState, BagState and CombingState. I’m trying to address this state feature gap now. -- Best, Alan Zhang

Re: Subscribe

2023-01-24 Thread Alan Zhang via dev
Thanks, Valentyn! I realized that I made the mistake after I sent the email to this address right away. Now I am able to receive the latest emails from both user@ and dev@ maillists after correct the addresses . Best, Alan Zhang From: Valentyn Tymofieiev Date: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5

Subscribe

2023-01-24 Thread Alan Zhang via dev