Re: baremaps.apache.org ?

2022-11-22 Thread Josh Fischer
Looks good, Bertil. There are a few more things we need to add to pass the website checks [1]. Do you have any preference (ui-wise) to how we add them? These are smaller changes I could help with, if you like. [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/pods/project/baremaps On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:34 PM

Re: Draft of the release process

2022-11-22 Thread Josh Fischer
Great job getting this started. Comments are inlined. Websites referenced: [1] https://creadur.apache.org/rat/ [2] https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaimers On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 4:24 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > Thanks for creating a process. Now we have a process, we can i

Re: Podling Baremaps Report Reminder - December 2022

2022-11-22 Thread Josh Fischer
Here is the starting point for the board report [1]. Make any changes/additions you feel should be there. I meant to get to this sooner, but you know, I was off getting married :-). I think we should aim to submit the report by Tuesday, December 6. [1]: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Yj1xe

Re: Draft of the release process

2022-11-22 Thread Florian Micklich
Hi all, Hi Martin :) I didn't know that proj4j itself uses EPSG data. Until now I thought it would be a good alternative lib besides EPSG approach. So what would be your advise with proj4(j) and how to handle that kind of implementation in an Apache project? Officially it is running on MIT lic

Re: Draft of the release process

2022-11-22 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Florian Le 22/11/2022 à 18:44, Florian Micklich a écrit : I didn't know that proj4j itself uses EPSG data. The CSV files in [1] are derived from EPSG tables. The file structures are different than EPSG database schema, but the data that they contain are EPSG data. The same information

Re: Draft of the release process

2022-11-22 Thread Bertil Chapuis
These clarifications are really interesting. I wasn’t aware of this issue and assumed that the license of proj4j (MIT) was compatible with Apache. The terms of the EPSG license are restrictive [1]: The data may not be distributed for profit by any third party. I’m quite amazed to discover that m

Re: baremaps.apache.org ?

2022-11-22 Thread Bertil Chapuis
Thanks a lot for taking the time to check the web site, I will consolidate the issue with your comments and try to address the issues soon. > On 22 Nov 2022, at 15:23, Josh Fischer wrote: > > Looks good, Bertil. There are a few more things we need to add to pass > the website checks [1]. Do

Re: Draft of the release process

2022-11-22 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Bertil Le 22/11/2022 à 21:47, Bertil Chapuis a écrit : The terms of the EPSG license are restrictive [1]: The data may not be distributed for profit by any third party. I’m quite amazed to discover that most geospatial solutions out there are probably violating this license. Yes. In t