Hi,
Josh Fischer wrote:
> ...I do find it helpful if I leave a PR open for 12-24
> hours to people a chance to make any comments before we merge...
+1, that's a great way of "radiating intent" [1], leaving a chance for
others to object without slowing down too much.
-Bertrand
[1]
https://medi
Thanks a lot for all your feedback.
Josh, your idea is balanced. Opening the PR and tagging reviewers leaves the
opportunity to comment or to object to a change.
The branch protection rules have been disabled.
Bertil
> On 16 Nov 2022, at 09:33, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Josh Fi
Hi,
It looks like Bertil made all the necessary changes to activate the
website publishing, and
https://github.com/apache/incubator-baremaps/deployments seems to
confirm that it is happening and github-pages deployments there
correctly point to https://baremaps.apache.org/
However https://baremap
I opened an ticket to track this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-23911
I’m not completely sure to understand the second point in the answer quoted
here:
- The CNAME file must be in the root of the repo, not inside the docs directory.
- You cannot choose baremaps.apache.org as t
Moving the Web site in a separate repository may be an option to consider, as
it is closer to what the documentation recommends.
> On 16 Nov 2022, at 16:28, Bertil Chapuis wrote:
>
> I opened an ticket to track this issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-23911
>
> I’m not comple
Bertil Chapuis wrote:
> ...Moving the Web site in a separate repository may be an option to consider,
> as it is closer to what the documentation recommends...
+1, and that can also make it easier for docs-only contributors to
jump in, and the build cycles of both repositories are completely
unr
The website is published with a separate repository:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-baremaps-site
We now need to make it conform to Apache’s standards. Here is the issue to
track progress on the necessary changes:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-baremaps/issues/489
In addition all the e
I agree with the fact that ctr can be a very effective way of pushing
forward. Ok for me to allow it, it is then to the pr author to consider
when he feels that a review is required before merging.
I'm really not used to this way, it will be interesting to see how this
performs ;)
Andrea
On Wed,
Bertrand,
Thank you for the article. I’ve never heard this term before.
My favorite bullet point from the first article is:
- Radiating intent shows others that adventurous behavior is acceptable
in the org.
I learned something new today. +1 to you, sir.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 4:3
