Hello Everyone,
The vote for Apache Baremaps 0.8.2-rc3 (incubating) is now closed.
The results obtained from the incubator [1] and dev mailing-list [2] are: 10
affirmative (+1) votes; 0 neutral (0) votes; 0 negative (-1) votes.
+1 kirs (binding, IPMC)
+1 jhyde (binding, IPMC)
+1 bdelacretaz (bi
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 17.0.13
= I was able to rebuild locally and get exact same output as the staged release
(0.8.1 had a minor issue, 0.8.2-rc3 has not any more): 41 files ok, *.jar
*.pom, *-sources.jar, baremaps-0.8.2-source-release.zip
congrats
H
Hello,
I follow up my vote as well:
+1 (non binding)
Bests
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 9:53 AM Leo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I follow up with my vote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> > On 19 Feb 2025, at 21:54, Bertil Chapuis wrote:
> >
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Ba
Hello,
I follow up with my vote:
+1 (non-binding)
> On 19 Feb 2025, at 21:54, Bertil Chapuis wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Baremaps 0.8.2 (incubating),
> release candidate 3. Apache Baremaps is a toolkit and a set of infrastructure
> components f
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating is in the name/version
- hash and checksum are good (both for source and binary distributions)
- DISCLAIMER is there and good
- LICENSE and NOTICE look good in the source distribution
- LICENSE and NOTICE (nit: there is no need to copy NOTICE from all
ASF proje
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 2:36 PM Bertil Chapuis wrote:
> ...The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/baremaps/0.8.2-rc3/
+1 for the release of the below artifacts, checked signatures, hashes,
NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER .
SHA2-512(apache-bar
Thank you all for taking the time to vote.
We still need one more vote from the IPMC in order to start a vote on the
incubator mailing list. I will keep this thread open for now.
Best regards,
Bertil
> On 13 Feb 2025, at 18:30, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> +1 jhyde (IPMC member)
>
> Downloaded,
+1 jhyde (IPMC member)
Downloaded, checked hashes, inspected NOTICE, LICENSE, README,
compared git tag with tar file contents, compiled and ran tests (JDK
17, Maven 3.8.1, Linux x86_64), ran RAT.
Julian
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:14 AM Andrea Borghi
wrote:
>
> Hi all, here is my vote:
>
> +1 non
Hi all, here is my vote:
+1 non binding
I have:
- checked all rat checks
- checked signatures
- checked checksums
- checked the build
- tested the binary release
- checked the checksums of jar
Everything seems good to me.
Bests
Andrea
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 3:02 PM Yongjun Hong wrote:
> I
I thought I couldn't vote because I'm not a PPMC member. 😅
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Yongjun
> Thank you, Calvin and Leo, for taking the time to vote.
>
> To everyone and to the new contributors, please do not hesitate to verify
> the artifacts and vote, even if your vote is non-binding (this is t
Thank you, Calvin and Leo, for taking the time to vote.
To everyone and to the new contributors, please do not hesitate to verify the
artifacts and vote, even if your vote is non-binding (this is the case for me
as well).
We had five recent or new contributors involved in this release, and the
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Leonard
> On 7 Feb 2025, at 14:36, Bertil Chapuis wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Following the issue identified in the way NOTICE files were included in the
> project, here is a new release candidate. This version also integrates the
> latest contributions made to the
Thanks Bertil,
+1 （binding）
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- disclaimer exists
- license and notice files look good
- file have correct ASF headers if necessary
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 9:36 PM Bertil Chapuis wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Following the issue iden
13 matches
Mail list logo
