Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc1 (incubating)

Ahh good call! I did the same thing. I was saying as in “I like it” not to approve any release. Sorry for the confusion! Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 30, 2023, at 6:46 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Oops, I should know better than to write ‘+1’ in a vote thread. It created > confusion. I shou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc1 (incubating)

Oops, I should know better than to write ‘+1’ in a vote thread. It created confusion. I should have said ‘I agree with Bertil. We do not need to remove the Appendix in order to comply with ASF licensing policy.’ My vote for this RC remains -1 (binding). Per release voting policy, you can overri

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc1 (incubating)

I love open source +1 Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 30, 2023, at 4:27 PM, Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > Haha, I’m so relieved. > >> On 30 Aug 2023, at 23:19, Julian Hyde wrote: >> >> +1 Cancel the emergency appendectomy. >> On Aug 30, 2023, at 2:07 PM, Bertil Chapuis wrote: >>> >>> Thank

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc1 (incubating)

Haha, I’m so relieved. > On 30 Aug 2023, at 23:19, Julian Hyde wrote: > > +1 Cancel the emergency appendectomy. > >> On Aug 30, 2023, at 2:07 PM, Bertil Chapuis wrote: >> >> Thanks a lot for looking at this. I think I now recall why I didn’t remove >> the Appendix when the issue was first re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc1 (incubating)

+1 Cancel the emergency appendectomy. > On Aug 30, 2023, at 2:07 PM, Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > Thanks a lot for looking at this. I think I now recall why I didn’t remove > the Appendix when the issue was first reported. The license itself refers to > the appendix when it defines “Work”: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc1 (incubating)

Thanks a lot for looking at this. I think I now recall why I didn’t remove the Appendix when the issue was first reported. The license itself refers to the appendix when it defines “Work”: "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or Object form, made available unde

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc1 (incubating)

Here is the definitive answer: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-346. My reading is that it is OK to include or exclude the appendix. > On Aug 30, 2023, at 6:38 AM, Calvin Kirs wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 7:17 PM Bertil Chapuis > wrote: >> >> Hello

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc1 (incubating)

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 7:17 PM Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > Hello Calvin, > Hello Julian, > > Thank you for your reviews and for taking the time to list these points. You > will find my comments below. > > > 1. The binary version needs to include the license of all components > > required for compi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc1 (incubating)

jhyde.apa...@gmail.com wrote: > [2] In LICENSE, you should remove the "APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache > License to your work” section. What is the reasoning for this removal? The appendix is part of the official license available here: https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt It i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc1 (incubating)

j...@joshfischer.io wrote: > Rat check showed 1441 unapproved licenses. How did you execute the check? Since we configured apache-rat to produce one report for all submodules, it requires a "clean" project's folder to give relevant results with current configuration. ./mvnw clean && ./mvnw a