[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache Aurora from the Incubator

The Incubator PMC vote for Apache Aurora to graduate has successfully passed, congratulations everyone! I will be adding the resolution to the upcoming board agenda and will keep everyone updated on the board vote -Jake With 6 +1 votes and no negatives the vote to graduate Apache Aurora from th

Build failed in Jenkins: AuroraBot #4261

See Changes: [wfarner] Run python style checks before unit tests in build.sh. -- Started by timer Building remotely on ubuntu-6 (docker Ubuntu ubuntu) in workspace

Jenkins build is back to normal : AuroraBot #4262

See

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache Aurora from the Incubator

Woohoo! -=Bill On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: > The Incubator PMC vote for Apache Aurora to graduate has successfully > passed, congratulations everyone! I will be adding the resolution to the > upcoming board agenda and will keep everyone updated on the board vote > > -Ja

Insufficient resource quota when production is True

I have a pretty basic job prod_resources = Resources(cpu = 0.5, ram = 256*MB, disk=2000*MB) My cluster has 3 slaves, each with 4 cpu cores and 16GB or RAM but I'me getting Job creation failed due to error: Insufficient resource quota: CPU quota exceeded by 1.00 core(s); RAM quota exceeded by 512

Re: Insufficient resource quota when production is True

This is, unfortunately, only sparsely documented [1]: Whether or not this is a production task backed by quota (Default: False). > Production jobs may preempt any non-production job, and may only be > preempted by production jobs in the same role and of higher priority. To > run jobs at this level

Re: Insufficient resource quota when production is True

I had seen the bit preempting and assumed that just by marking a job as production, its guaranteed whatever resources are allocated to it (by the job config) and non-producton jobs could be de-prioritized to meet the requirements. It makes sense now. Thanks for the quick response, as always. On

Re: Shepherding new contributions

I have set Joshua and Bill to be the defaults for now: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31496/ On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > This would work. > Anyone assigned as reviewer in the RB need to either execute the > review or excuse themselves to make sure all "ship it" votes a

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache Aurora from the Incubator

Great to hear! On Thu, Feb 26, 2015, at 10:54 AM, Bill Farner wrote: > Woohoo! > > -=Bill > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Jake Farrell > wrote: > > > The Incubator PMC vote for Apache Aurora to graduate has successfully > > passed, congratulations everyone! I will be adding the resolution