Chatted with davmclau, wfarner, kevints and jcohen. The consensus is
to move forward with the state-based approach to ease up
troubleshooting from day one. Will update the RB unless there are
objections to this approach.
Brief design update summary:
- there will be 2 new job update states: ROLL_FO
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> To add a bit of history to the topic, the current design has been
> debated heavily here [1] and an active/lazy consensus was reached
> around implementing the first iteration as lightweight as possible
> without persisting any durable s
+1, the implementation tradeoffs were discussed extensively in that thread.
Regarding the potential user experience my thought is that
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-aurora-dev/201410.mbox/%3CCAAATh-bA0f4yPAoH8+xrwd=xkzhgqvm8nylle6ihha-hdes...@mail.gmail.com%3E
presents an acc
I'm actually beginning to think that an explicit state for "waiting for a
heartbeat" might be easier to implement than volatile state. In a world
where job updates are fully automated, i could see a bunch of users asking
why a job update made no progress for a period of time, so it's really nice
i
Here's the permalink to the thread in question:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-aurora-dev/201410.mbox/%3CCAOTkfX7x2oipk4ZFysoS0uWZRizOnKJA3y15pvEW5K4YnUHw-A%40mail.gmail.com%3E
-=Bill
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> To add a bit of history to the
Here's the permalink to the thread in question:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-aurora-dev/201410.mbox/%3CCAOTkfX7x2oipk4ZFysoS0uWZRizOnKJA3y15pvEW5K4YnUHw-A%40mail.gmail.com%3E
-=Bill
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> To add a bit of history to the
To add a bit of history to the topic, the current design has been
debated heavily here [1] and an active/lazy consensus was reached
around implementing the first iteration as lightweight as possible
without persisting any durable state.
My take on this - we should proceed as originally proposed gi
