On 24 March 2015 at 21:33, George Sirois wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't think my change will be able to make it in as-is.
>
> As Brian Wickman pointed out, it could introduce serious problems because
> there are varying timeouts across the scheduler/executor, so if you set
> your wait time to be
Unfortunately I don't think my change will be able to make it in as-is.
As Brian Wickman pointed out, it could introduce serious problems because
there are varying timeouts across the scheduler/executor, so if you set
your wait time to be too high, the scheduler might start to consider the
tasks l
On 24 March 2015 at 20:57, Erb, Stephan wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> we are implementing the /health endpoint in our services but omit the
> implementation of the unauthenticated lifecycle methods /quitquitquit and
> /abortabortabort.
>
> As a consequence, stopping a service is taxed by 10 seconds w
