On Apr 8, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Bill Farner wrote:
> I'd like to revisit this, since we gain a lot by exposing our docs in more
> places (http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/ is wonderful, we should replicate
> that). If this can indeed be automated, it seems like a huge win. I had not
> heard of
I'd like to revisit this, since we gain a lot by exposing our docs in more
places (http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/ is wonderful, we should
replicate that). If this can indeed be automated, it seems like a huge
win. I had not heard of pandoc before, it looks awesome!
*Sebastien* - a few questi
On Feb 18, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> Based on what i've seen in other projects around the ASF I would say that
> we should keep the docs on the core website and not external. This will
> help the main websites seo and docs that are pushed externally tend to not
> get updated as muc
Based on what i've seen in other projects around the ASF I would say that
we should keep the docs on the core website and not external. This will
help the main websites seo and docs that are pushed externally tend to not
get updated as much as they are forgotten about.
-Jake
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014
On Feb 17, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Dave Lester wrote:
> Sebastien,
>
> This is great, thank you!
>
> There were a few bugs in our existing tooling for rendering docs on the
> site which has prevented rendering the docs as-is (delayed on part;
> although JakeF offered to help). I am inclined to switc
Sebastien,
This is great, thank you!
There were a few bugs in our existing tooling for rendering docs on the
site which has prevented rendering the docs as-is (delayed on part;
although JakeF offered to help). I am inclined to switch entirely to what
you've contributed here seeing -- what do othe
