Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Aurora #731

Aha, understood. Thanks for the explanation. On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > You're reading it correctly, this was my ill-fated attempt to make sure > we're prompt about raising the bar when we've passed it, forcing us to > converge upwards. Unfortunately the number is not

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Aurora #731

You're reading it correctly, this was my ill-fated attempt to make sure we're prompt about raising the bar when we've passed it, forcing us to converge upwards. Unfortunately the number is not consistent. -=Bill On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:37 PM, David McLaughlin wrote: > Am I reading this wrong

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Aurora #731

Am I reading this wrong or does that say that the actual coverage of 0.84 exceeds the _minimum_ coverage and this led to the build failure? On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Joshua Cohen wrote: > Failing the build on this check is just too flaky (coverage numbers vary > slightly based on JVM). Go

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Aurora #731

Failing the build on this check is just too flaky (coverage numbers vary slightly based on JVM). Going to send a review to make it advisory only. On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > See > >