Re: Python versions (redux)

2014-07-17 Thread Joe Smith
Me as well- thanks for bringing this up! On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > Bhuvan's link [2] was the clincher for me. +1 to dropping support, as the > python developers have. > > -=Bill > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Bhuvan Arumugam > wrote: > > > Only reason I c

Re: Python versions (redux)

2014-07-17 Thread Bill Farner
Bhuvan's link [2] was the clincher for me. +1 to dropping support, as the python developers have. -=Bill On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Bhuvan Arumugam wrote: > Only reason I could think of supporting py26 is to support rhel6.x > customers. Now that rhel7 is out [1], it make sense to disco

Re: Python versions (redux)

2014-07-17 Thread Bhuvan Arumugam
Only reason I could think of supporting py26 is to support rhel6.x customers. Now that rhel7 is out [1], it make sense to discontinue support for py26. We should document it in supported platforms though. We should add a pointer for rhel6.x customers to upgrade python. It also make sense as py26 i

Re: Python versions (redux)

2014-07-17 Thread Kevin Sweeney
+1 to dropping 2.6 On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Mark Chu-Carroll wrote: > A couple of months ago, we had a discussion about which python versions to > support. (See > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-aurora-dev/201404.mbox/%3CCAFGkSCk71%2BziUQCsnMfStr-ucrT52DLEgBfHA-o09

Python versions (redux)

2014-07-17 Thread Mark Chu-Carroll
A couple of months ago, we had a discussion about which python versions to support. (See http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-aurora-dev/201404.mbox/%3CCAFGkSCk71%2BziUQCsnMfStr-ucrT52DLEgBfHA-o097683PstLQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E to refresh your memory.) At the time, we punted on it, bec