https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-September/128287.html
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Mark Chu-Carroll
> > wrote:
> > > A couple of months ago, we had a discussion about which python versions
> > to
> > > support. (See
&
http://www.redhat.com/about/news/press-archive/2014/6/red-hat-unveils-rhel-7
> [2]
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-September/128287.html
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Mark Chu-Carroll
> wrote:
> > A couple of months ago, we had a discussion about
of months ago, we had a discussion about which python versions to
> support. (See
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-aurora-dev/201404.mbox/%3CCAFGkSCk71%2BziUQCsnMfStr-ucrT52DLEgBfHA-o097683PstLQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> to refresh your memory.)
>
> At the tim
+1 to dropping 2.6
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Mark Chu-Carroll
wrote:
> A couple of months ago, we had a discussion about which python versions to
> support. (See
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-aurora-dev/201404.mbox/%3CCAFGkSCk71%2BziUQCsnMfStr-uc
A couple of months ago, we had a discussion about which python versions to
support. (See
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-aurora-dev/201404.mbox/%3CCAFGkSCk71%2BziUQCsnMfStr-ucrT52DLEgBfHA-o097683PstLQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
to refresh your memory.)
At the time, we punted on it
Per Brian's reply, it turns out that we can maintain perfect backwards
compatibility for free, by using a library we already depend on.
-Mark
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Alexius Ludeman wrote:
> -1
>
> I would highly recommend trying to be compatible with python 2.6. RHEL/OEL
> 6u3-6
-1
I would highly recommend trying to be compatible with python 2.6. RHEL/OEL
6u3-6u5 are still on python 2.6...
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Bill Farner wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Jake Farrell wrote:
>
> > +1 to keeping as current as possible and not introducing workaro
Please use twitter.common.lang Compatibility.exec_function:
https://github.com/twitter/commons/blob/master/src/python/twitter/common/lang/__init__.py#L122
Happy on 2.x and 3.x (even 2.6.x)
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Mark Chu-Carroll wrote:
> Folks:
>
> For one of the client changes I'm w
+1.
I can update AURORA-227 to enforce Python 2.7 as the minimum version (
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18537/).
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Bill Farner wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Jake Farrell wrote:
>
> > +1 to keeping as current as possible and not introducing workaro
+1
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Jake Farrell wrote:
> +1 to keeping as current as possible and not introducing workarounds for
> older os variants. Python 2.7 is the default on Ubuntu 12.04 and OS X which
> is what a majority of people will use for testing/development and our
> Vagrant images are
+1 to keeping as current as possible and not introducing workarounds for
older os variants. Python 2.7 is the default on Ubuntu 12.04 and OS X which
is what a majority of people will use for testing/development and our
Vagrant images are built around this as well. AURORA-227 introduces a check
for
Folks:
For one of the client changes I'm working on, there's a python version
compatibility issue.
For Python 2.7 and 3.x, there's an "exec" function which I use for loading
hooks. In python 2.6, exec is a statement, an the function form doesn't
work.
This is something that can be worked around,
12 matches
Mail list logo
