Re: From Aurora 0.14 to 0.15

+1 to getting caught up with current Mesos version -Jake On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Stephan Erb wrote: > Hi everyone, > > even though we are still in the process of getting 0.14 out of the > door, I'd like to propose that we aim for a short release cycle for > 0.15. > > This would entail:

Build failed in Jenkins: aurora-packaging-nightly #330

See -- [...truncated 1627 lines...] Setting up libtsan0:amd64 (4.9.2-10) ... Setting up libubsan0:amd64 (4.9.2-10) ... Setting up libxau6:amd64 (1:1.0.8-1) ... Setting up libxdmcp6:amd64 (1:1.1.1-

From Aurora 0.14 to 0.15

Hi everyone, even though we are still in the process of getting 0.14 out of the door, I'd like to propose that we aim for a short release cycle for 0.15. This would entail: * the update to Mesos 0.28.x * no deprecation removals, so that it's easy to update from 0.14 to 0.15.  Any objections? 

Re: [DRAFT][REPORT]: Apache Aurora

+1 On Fr, 2016-06-10 at 23:06 -0400, Jake Farrell wrote: > Please take a second to review the board report below and provide any > feedback (+1 or any desired modifications). I will submit this report > pending any changes monday afternoon > > -Jake > > > > Apache Aurora is a stateless and fau

Re: [DRAFT][REPORT]: Apache Aurora

that was only talked about on the private@aurora list so far so would not be added to the draft report posted for review on dev@, that detail would have gone into a different section on the board report -Jake On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Zameer Manji wrote: > Jake, > > Shouldn't we mention