Build failed in Jenkins: Aurora #1423

See Changes: [wfarner] Rename NEWS to RELEASE-NOTES.md -- [...truncated 4168 lines...] from pants.bin.pants_exe import main ImportError: No module named pants

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename NEWS to RELEASE-NOTES.md

Thanks for the feedback, folks. This patch has landed. On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Jake Farrell wrote: > LICENSE and NOTICE are the only 2 required named files within the release. > The changelog is an optional item and can be named whatever we like, +1 to > making it easier to understand

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename NEWS to RELEASE-NOTES.md

LICENSE and NOTICE are the only 2 required named files within the release. The changelog is an optional item and can be named whatever we like, +1 to making it easier to understand its purpose -Jake On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > Our NEWS file has turned into a useful sou

Jenkins build is back to normal : aurora-packaging-nightly #225

See

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename NEWS to RELEASE-NOTES.md

Patch is up here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44806/ On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Maxim Khutornenko wrote: > +1 to both. > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > > Our NEWS file has turned into a useful source of information, but i think > > the name doesn't clearly illus

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename NEWS to RELEASE-NOTES.md

+1 to both. On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > Our NEWS file has turned into a useful source of information, but i think > the name doesn't clearly illustrate its purpose. Since we have been > primarily using it to manage release notes, i propose we rename the file to > RELEAS

[PROPOSAL] Rename NEWS to RELEASE-NOTES.md

Our NEWS file has turned into a useful source of information, but i think the name doesn't clearly illustrate its purpose. Since we have been primarily using it to manage release notes, i propose we rename the file to RELEASE-NOTES.md. As the name implies, i also propose that we formally use mark

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

+1 Verified using instructions starting here: https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md#released and pkg_root="https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/"; On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:10 PM, John Sirois wrote: > I propose that we accept the fol

[VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm packaging for Apache Aurora 0.12.0. *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/ * The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following: --- The CHANGELOG is viewable at: *

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:09 AM, John Sirois wrote: > My sanity may be partially restored, although several things are wonky. > More below on my morning experiments, all after vagrant destroy for sanity > sake in the test/rpm/centos-7 dir of the aurora-packaging repo: > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:09 AM, John Sirois wrote: > My sanity may be partially restored, although several things are wonky. > More below on my morning experiments, all after vagrant destroy for sanity > sake in the test/rpm/centos-7 dir of the aurora-packaging repo: > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

My sanity may be partially restored, although several things are wonky. More below on my morning experiments, all after vagrant destroy for sanity sake in the test/rpm/centos-7 dir of the aurora-packaging repo: On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > -1 > > I'm had trouble getting