Re: [DRAFT] [REPORT] Apache Aurora

+1 On Mon, Feb 29, 2016, at 05:27 PM, Jake Farrell wrote: > +1 looks good > > -Jake > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > > > Please take a moment to read through a draft of the board report i have > > prepared for Aurora. I will plan to submit mid-week, so please let me k

Re: [DRAFT] [REPORT] Apache Aurora

+1 looks good -Jake On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > Please take a moment to read through a draft of the board report i have > prepared for Aurora. I will plan to submit mid-week, so please let me know > if you would like to see any edits/additions! > > ## Description: >

[DRAFT] [REPORT] Apache Aurora

Please take a moment to read through a draft of the board report i have prepared for Aurora. I will plan to submit mid-week, so please let me know if you would like to see any edits/additions! ## Description: Apache Aurora lets you use an Apache Mesos cluster as a private cloud. It supports r

Build failed in Jenkins: aurora-packaging-nightly #211

See -- [...truncated 7713 lines...] Get:66 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie/main libcroco3 amd64 0.6.8-3+b1 [135 kB] Get:67 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie/main librtmp1 amd6

Re: Weekly community meeting

I think it's worth raising the topic of whether to continue regularly-scheduled meetings. Given the distributed community, it is difficult to find a time that routinely works for everyone. Eliminating this might also encourage more frequent use of the mailing list when discussion topics arise, wh

Re: [PROPOSAL] DB snapshotting

Thanks for the detailed write up and real-world details! I generally support momentum towards a single task store implementation, so +1 on dealing with that. I anticipated there would be a performance win from straight-to-SQL snapshots, so I am a +1 on that as well. In summary, +1 on all fronts!

[PROPOSAL] DB snapshotting

(Apologies for the wordy problem statement but I feel it's really necessary to justify the proposal). Over the past two weeks we have been battling a nasty scheduler issue in production: the scheduler suddenly stops responding to any user requests and subsequently gets killed by our health monitor

Re: Weekly community meeting

I agree with Maxim, a weekly meeting is too frequent relative to the current activity on the project. I think changing it to bi-weekly schedule would be better overall. On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Joshua Cohen wrote: > I'm in the activated list of freenode-cloaks, but I'm not able to start

Summary of IRC Meeting in #aurora

Summary of IRC Meeting in #aurora at Mon Feb 29 19:00:35 2016: Attendees: jcohen - Preface IRC log follows: ## Preface ## [Mon Feb 29 19:00:43 2016] : Hi everybody! [Mon Feb 29 19:00:57 2016] : It’s time for our “weekly” community meeting. [Mon Feb 29 19:01:32 2016] : Let’s start with

Re: Weekly community meeting

I'm in the activated list of freenode-cloaks, but I'm not able to start meetings. On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: > A registered nick and ASF cloak are required in order to kick off meetings > with asfbot, registration requests can be made at [1]. Currently for Aurora > dle

Re: Weekly community meeting

It feels like there isn't much happening on the weekly basis to warrant a discussion every Monday. Perhaps moving to a bi-weekly schedule will recharge this meeting with more interesting content and improve participation? Also, Mondays are generally overloaded. I think having it on any other day w

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 RC4

IIRC site changes aren't blocked on binaries. I believe the only link is the bintray button, which automatically tracks the latest bintray version. https://aurora.apache.org/downloads/ On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:10 AM, John Sirois wrote: > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Jake Farrell > wrote

Re: Weekly community meeting

A registered nick and ASF cloak are required in order to kick off meetings with asfbot, registration requests can be made at [1]. Currently for Aurora dlester, jfarrell, kts, wfarner , and zmanji are the only ones who are registered and setup to start the meetings -Jake [1]: https://svn.apache.o

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 RC4

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: > Released source artifacts have all ready been promoted, any committer can > update the website to reflect this change (though ideally it is handled > immediately after the release is promoted). > > For the binary artifacts since they where n

Re: Weekly community meeting

I agree that it's unfortunate we've missed a few meetings. Historically speaking it's always been one of a few people who kick the meeting off, and if those folks aren't available the meetings seem to not happen. That said, I think we should take a more decentralized approach. We don't need to rely