Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet/Iceberg adding new interval types & Arrow compatibility

2025-06-22 Thread Antoine Pitrou
The Arrow format defines data types, it doesn't mandate particular semantics for the operations that one might want to implement them. An Arrow implementation could expose different operations (e.g. compute functions in Arrow C++ parlance) depending on the exact duration/interval addition d

Re: [DISCUSS] Monorepo maintenance - closing stale issues and PRs

2025-06-22 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hi Nic, In general, I think addressing this is a good idea. Some random thoughts below: Le 17/06/2025 à 12:40, Nic Crane a écrit : I'd like to take the following actions: Category: 1 - PRs - haven't been commented on or touched in the past 12 months (137 at present; 40% of open PRs)[1] Cl

Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet/Iceberg adding new interval types & Arrow compatibility

2025-06-22 Thread Felipe Oliveira Carvalho
What about adding a canonical extension type so teams using Arrow don't have to keep re-inventing timestamps and duration types? Using Decimal128 as storage type for these since we are missing 128-bit integers (another debate). -- Felipe On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 9:48 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Monorepo maintenance - closing stale issues and PRs

2025-06-22 Thread Nic Crane
Thanks for your comments Antoine, > Do contributors actually have the rights to reopen a PR of theirs? I think so, but we should double-check. I had a search and it appears that people who are not committers cannot re-open closed PRs. Instead of just closing, I could add a 30 day warning and stal