El mié, 17 ene 2024 a las 23:37, Matt Topol () escribió:
>
> Yea, I confirmed you're correct. I have a fix for this now and I've put up
> a PR[1] for it that Raul can cherry-pick into a new RC.
As the issue seems to have been around for 1.5 or 2 years I don't
think this issue requires a new RC. It
Hi Sarah,
Thanks for pursuing this.
The ASF 3rd Party License Policy lists a number of standard,
off-the-shelf licenses that are compatible with Category B, but the
policy does not include any provision for custom-written licenses.
This appears to be a custom-written license. Is that correct?
Is
Hi Ian,
Thank you for sharing your input on this.
> This appears to be a custom-written license. Is that correct?
Yes, that is correct. This is a custom written license.
> If not, can you provide some explanation of why this license should be
> considered to meet the criteria for Category B?
Yes, that was roughly what I was requesting (I was suggesting a single PR
with many commits that would be merged with the history).
It's hard to provide a more concrete opinion on this without seeing the
quantity and complexity of the code. If it's 5,000 lines of code, it
probably doesn't matter.
