Re: CIDR 2024

For the sake of clarity, it seems this is talking about the Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research: https://www.cidrdb.org/cidr2024/ Regards Antoine. Le 06/12/2023 à 01:15, Wes McKinney a écrit : I will also be there. On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 12:58 PM Tony Wang wrote: I am Get

Re: [Discussion][Gandiva] Migration JIT engine from MCJIT to ORC v2

Given that MCJIT is deprecated and there doesn't seem to be a downside to the new APIs, migrating to ORC v2 sounds fine to me. Just a question: does it raise the minimum supported LLVM version? Regards Antoine. Le 05/12/2023 à 03:35, Yue Ni a écrit : Hi there, I'd like to initiate a dis

Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.7.0 RC1

Hello, Thank you for making the release. I tried to verify it, but ran into some kind of network issue: ``` + curl --fail --location --remote-name --show-error --silent https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/KEYS curl: (28) Failed to connect to dist.apache.org port 443 after 75005 ms: Cou

Re: CIDR 2024

Yes, sorry, thank you! On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:33 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > For the sake of clarity, it seems this is talking about the Conference > on Innovative Data Systems Research: > https://www.cidrdb.org/cidr2024/ > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > Le 06/12/2023 à 01:15, Wes McKinney a é

Re: [Discussion][C++][FlightRPC] What stage to submit a PR for Flight SQL ODBC driver

Thanks for the update, Alina. This sounds good, my only question for the broader community is whether there is enough imported code that we should go through the IP clearance process [1]. It's never been clear to me what exactly the threshold for this is. flightsql-odbc [2] is already quite larg

Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.7.0 RC1

+1 I ran the following command on Ubuntu 22.04: VERIFY_FORCE_USE_JULIA_BINARY=1 dev/release/verify_rc.sh 2.7.0 1 Raúl El mié, 6 dic 2023 a las 12:16, Eric Hanson () escribió: > > Hello, > > Thank you for making the release. I tried to verify it, but ran into some > kind of network issue: > ```

Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.7.0 RC1

+1 Tested on Ubuntu 22.04/x86_64 On Wed, Dec 6, 2023, at 09:19, Raúl Cumplido wrote: > +1 > > I ran the following command on Ubuntu 22.04: > VERIFY_FORCE_USE_JULIA_BINARY=1 dev/release/verify_rc.sh 2.7.0 1 > > Raúl > > El mié, 6 dic 2023 a las 12:16, Eric Hanson () > escribió: >> >> Hello, >> >>

Re: [Discussion][Gandiva] Migration JIT engine from MCJIT to ORC v2

Hi Antoine, > does it raise the minimum supported LLVM version According to LLVM's documentation [1] [2], the LLJIT API (for ORC v2 JIT) was added in LLVM 8.0, so the minimum version required will be LLVM 8.0 I believe. And I see currently we support LLVM 7.0 ~ 17.0 in arrow [3], so we may have t

Re: [DISCUSS] Conventions for transporting Arrow data over HTTP

Hi, While this looks like a nice start, I would expect more precise recommendations for writing non-trivial services. Especially, one question is how to send both an application-specific POST request and an Arrow stream, or an application-specific GET response and an Arrow stream. This migh

[DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

Flight SQL has been marked 'experimental' since the beginning. Given that it's now used by a few systems for a few years now, should we remove this qualifier? I don't expect us to be making breaking changes anymore. This came up in a GitHub PR: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/39040 -David

Re: [DISCUSS] Conventions for transporting Arrow data over HTTP

Antoine, Thank you for taking a look. I agree—these are basic examples intended to prove the concept and answer fundamental questions. Next I intend to expand the set of examples to cover more complex cases. > This might necessitate some kind of framing layer, or a > standardized delimiter. I am

Re: [DISCUSS] Conventions for transporting Arrow data over HTTP

I just remembered that there is an unused "Arrow Experiments" repo [1] which Wes created a few years ago [2]. That seems like a more appropriate place to open PRs like this one. If there are no objections, I will start using that repo for these Arrow-over-HTTP PRs. [1] https://github.com/apache/ar

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 In <0336b0fb-87d1-4c68-b6dd-727678fe5...@app.fastmail.com> "[DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental" on Wed, 06 Dec 2023 12:59:54 -0500, "David Li" wrote: > Flight SQL has been marked 'experimental' since the beginning. Given that > it's now used by a few systems for a few years now, should

Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.7.0 RC1

Hi, Could you try again to check whether the failure is a temporary network problem? And could you also try accessing https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/KEYS with other HTTP client such as a Web browser? Thanks, -- kou In "Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.7.0 RC1" on

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

At this point we depend on it heavily :) +1 On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4:06 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > +1 > > In <0336b0fb-87d1-4c68-b6dd-727678fe5...@app.fastmail.com> > "[DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental" on Wed, 06 Dec 2023 12:59:54 > -0500, > "David Li" wrote: > > > Flight SQL has been ma

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 from me. It's used in a good number of databases now. Get Outlook for Android From: David Li Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:59:54 AM To: dev@arrow.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental Flight SQL has been marked

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

+1, I agree with everyone else On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 7:49 PM James Duong wrote: > +1 from me. It's used in a good number of databases now. > > Get Outlook for Android > > From: David Li > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:59:54 AM > To