Union integration test

2020-07-07 Thread Ryan Murray
Hey all, While trying to finish up the Union integration test between Java & C++ https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7290 I came across a minor problem that I hope I could get some clarification on. I have the integration test for C++ -> Java passing but Java -> C++ is giving me trouble. The c

Re: Union integration test

2020-07-07 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hello Ryan Le 07/07/2020 à 11:21, Ryan Murray a écrit : > > While trying to finish up the Union integration test between Java & C++ > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7290 I came across a minor problem > that I hope I could get some clarification on. > > I have the integration test for C++

Re: Union integration test

2020-07-07 Thread Ryan Murray
sigh...thanks Antoine, that did the trick. That's what I get for programming pre-coffee ;-) On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:31 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Hello Ryan > > Le 07/07/2020 à 11:21, Ryan Murray a écrit : > > > > While trying to finish up the Union integration test between Java & C++ > > ht

[NIGHTLY] Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2020-07-07-0

2020-07-07 Thread Crossbow
Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2020-07-07-0 All tasks: https://github.com/ursa-labs/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2020-07-07-0 Failed Tasks: - homebrew-cpp: URL: https://github.com/ursa-labs/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2020-07-07-0-travis-homebrew-cpp - test-conda-cpp-valg

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding a pull-style iterator API to the C data interface

2020-07-07 Thread Wes McKinney
Any opinions about this? It seems the next steps would be a concrete API proposal and perhaps a reference implementation thereof. On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 11:26 PM Wes McKinney wrote: > > In ARROW-8301 [1] and elsewhere we've been discussing how to > communicate what amounts to a sequence of array

Arrow sync call July 8 at 12:00 US/Eastern, 16:00 UTC

2020-07-07 Thread Neal Richardson
Hi all, Reminder that our biweekly call is tomorrow, 24 hours from right now, at https://meet.google.com/vtm-teks-phx. All are welcome to join. Notes will be sent out to the mailing list afterward. Neal

Re: [DISCUSS] Incrementing Arrow MetadataVersion from V4 to V5 for 1.0.0 release

2020-07-07 Thread David Li
I see there's ARROW-9258 to do the backwards compatibility work for C++ and ARROW-9333 to expose this for Python; is there any ticket or anyone planning on doing this for Java? Otherwise I'm willing to look at it so that we can do some testing with Flight. Best, David On 6/29/20, Wes McKinney wr

Re: [DISCUSS] Incrementing Arrow MetadataVersion from V4 to V5 for 1.0.0 release

2020-07-07 Thread Wes McKinney
I don't recall a ticket for the Java work but you're certainly a good candidate to take the lead on it. On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 3:16 PM David Li wrote: > > I see there's ARROW-9258 to do the backwards compatibility work for > C++ and ARROW-9333 to expose this for Python; is there any ticket or > a

Re: [DISCUSS] Incrementing Arrow MetadataVersion from V4 to V5 for 1.0.0 release

2020-07-07 Thread David Li
I just filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9362 and plan to work on it tomorrow. David On 7/7/20, Wes McKinney wrote: > I don't recall a ticket for the Java work but you're certainly a good > candidate to take the lead on it. > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 3:16 PM David Li wrote: >> >

[DRAFT] Arrow Board Report July 2020

2020-07-07 Thread Wes McKinney
Please let me know comments or additions to the below. This is due to the ASF board tomorrow. --- ## Description: The mission of Apache Arrow is the creation and maintenance of software related to columnar in-memory processing and data interchange. The project has some level of support for 11 di

Re: [DRAFT] Arrow Board Report July 2020

2020-07-07 Thread Neal Richardson
Looks good to me. On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 3:45 PM Wes McKinney wrote: > Please let me know comments or additions to the below. This is due to > the ASF board tomorrow. > > --- > > ## Description: > > The mission of Apache Arrow is the creation and maintenance of software > related > to columnar i

Re: [DRAFT] Arrow Board Report July 2020

2020-07-07 Thread Micah Kornfield
Worth mentioning the website work? On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 3:47 PM Neal Richardson wrote: > Looks good to me. > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 3:45 PM Wes McKinney wrote: > > > Please let me know comments or additions to the below. This is due to > > the ASF board tomorrow. > > > > --- > > > > ## Desc