Re: Looking to 1.0

2020-01-04 Thread Wes McKinney
Hi, Unless I’m mistaken we have a number of format implementation completeness deficits that would make it hard to do a 1.0 release until they are taken care of * Null type * Union types * Dictionary deltas and replacements (Anything else?) Note on this last item, the integration test JSON form

Re: Looking to 1.0

2020-01-04 Thread Antoine Pitrou
IIRC we would also need Java implementations of LargeList and LargeString, though of course that requires the involvement of interested Java contributors. Given all this, I think we can go with a 0.16.0 major release soon. Regards Antoine. Le 04/01/2020 à 11:16, Wes McKinney a écrit : > Hi,

[NIGHTLY] Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2020-01-04-0

2020-01-04 Thread Crossbow
Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2020-01-04-0 All tasks: https://github.com/ursa-labs/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2020-01-04-0 Failed Tasks: - gandiva-jar-osx: URL: https://github.com/ursa-labs/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2020-01-04-0-travis-gandiva-jar-osx - homebrew-cpp:

Re: Looking to 1.0

2020-01-04 Thread Krisztián Szűcs
Hi, IMO we should focus on the 1.0 release while maintaining the recently stabilized ~3 month release period: 0.12.0: 2019-01-20 0.13.0: 2019-04-01 0.14.0: 2019-07-04 0.15.0: 2019-10-05 So a 0.16.0 release sounds much more realistic to me at the end of the next week or the week after. Perhaps w

Re: Looking to 1.0

2020-01-04 Thread Jacques Nadeau
The third ticket I was commenting on was ARROW-4526. Fan, do you want to take a shot at that one? On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 8:16 PM Fan Liya wrote: > Hi Jacques, > > I am interested in the issues, and if it is possible, I would like to try > to resolve them. > > Thanks. > > Liya Fan > > On Sat,

Re: Human-readable version of Arrow Schema?

2020-01-04 Thread Jacques Nadeau
What do people think about using the C interface representation? On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 12:42 PM Micah Kornfield wrote: > I opened https://github.com/google/flatbuffers/issues/5688 to try to get > some clarity. > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 12:13 PM Wes McKinney wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2019

Re: Human-readable version of Arrow Schema?

2020-01-04 Thread Jacques Nadeau
I guess we'd still need to introduce a way to nest, it only has type representation. On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 2:16 PM Jacques Nadeau wrote: > What do people think about using the C interface representation? > > On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 12:42 PM Micah Kornfield > wrote: > >> I opened https://github

Re: Human-readable version of Arrow Schema?

2020-01-04 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Le 04/01/2020 à 23:17, Jacques Nadeau a écrit : > I guess we'd still need to introduce a way to nest, it only has type > representation. Right. Before exploring this direction more in depth, I think it would be useful to know what the intended use case is. Perhaps the OP (Christian Hudon) woul

Re: Looking to 1.0

2020-01-04 Thread Fan Liya
Hi Jacques, ARROW-4526 is interesting. I would like to try to resolve it. Thanks a lot for the information. Best, Liya Fan On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 6:14 AM Jacques Nadeau wrote: > The third ticket I was commenting on was ARROW-4526. > > Fan, do you want to take a shot at that one? > > On Fri, J