Sure, I've added you to the JIRA contributors role (so you can self-assign in
the future) and assigned the JIRA to you. Thanks for taking this on.
-David
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021, at 11:06, Nate Bauernfeind wrote:
> David, do you mind assigning to me? I'll get a PR up within the next two
> days. The
David, do you mind assigning to me? I'll get a PR up within the next two
days. The JIRA username is 'nbauernfeind'.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 8:41 AM David Li wrote:
> I filed ARROW-13449 for this, thanks for the clarification.
>
> -David
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021, at 10:25, Wes McKinney wrote:
> >
I filed ARROW-13449 for this, thanks for the clarification.
-David
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021, at 10:25, Wes McKinney wrote:
> IIRC, we did intend to encapsulate the Schema in an IPC message.
> Updating the docs / comments in the Flight.proto is the right thing to
> do.
>
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 12:
IIRC, we did intend to encapsulate the Schema in an IPC message.
Updating the docs / comments in the Flight.proto is the right thing to
do.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 12:47 PM Micah Kornfield wrote:
>
> I think if all reference implementations are doing this the same way we
> should update the docs
I think if all reference implementations are doing this the same way we
should update the docs and I don't think a vote is necessary.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 10:27 AM David Li wrote:
> Hey Nate,
>
> Good catch. I would say it was intentional to use an IPC message (while
> the length is redundant
Hey Nate,
Good catch. I would say it was intentional to use an IPC message (while the
length is redundant, it also contains the metadata version and custom
metadata), and the comment is a little vague. I'm not sure if we need a vote to
update this since it is changing files in the format dir.
