Re: Plasma scenarios

2019-09-09 Thread Sutou Kouhei
If we build the GLib-based library with MSVC, it doesn't require MSYS nor Cygwin. It just requires MSVC. In "RE: Plasma scenarios" on Mon, 9 Sep 2019 22:05:26 +, Eric Erhardt wrote: > I don't think the C# bindings would use the Glib-based libraries on Wi

RE: Plasma scenarios

2019-09-09 Thread Eric Erhardt
--- From: Sutou Kouhei Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 4:43 PM To: dev@arrow.apache.org Subject: Re: Plasma scenarios Hi, > In theory you could use the GLib-based library with MSVC, the main > requirement is gobject-introspection > > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.

Re: Plasma scenarios

2019-09-09 Thread Sutou Kouhei
ings by hand. (We can generate bindings automatically with GObject Introspection.) But we need to some tasks to build the GLib-based library with MSVC. I'll work on it in a few months. Thanks, -- kou In "Re: Plasma scenarios" on Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:00:00 -0500, Wes McKinney

Re: Plasma scenarios

2019-09-09 Thread Sutou Kouhei
Hi, > I know Plasma today is not supported on Windows, but I think support could be > added since Windows supports memory mapped files (through a different API > than mmap) and it now supports Unix Domain Sockets [1]. > ... > [1] https://devblogs.microsoft.com/commandline/af_unix-comes-to-window

Re: Plasma scenarios

2019-09-09 Thread Wes McKinney
hi Eric, On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:09 PM Eric Erhardt wrote: > > I was looking for the high level scenarios for the Plasma In-Memory Object > Store. A colleague of mine suggested we could use it to pass data between a > C# process and a Python process. > > I've read the intro blog [0] on Plasma,