Re: Nightly binary packages

2019-03-01 Thread Krisztián Szűcs
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:30 PM Kouhei Sutou wrote: > Hi, > > > - How should We handle the signing procedure? Simply omit? > > For .deb and .rpm, we need to sign them to install them by > apt/yum. > > We should use a GPG key only for nightly for this > propose. We should not use GPG keys in > htt

Re: Nightly binary packages

2019-02-27 Thread Kouhei Sutou
Hi, > - How should We handle the signing procedure? Simply omit? For .deb and .rpm, we need to sign them to install them by apt/yum. We should use a GPG key only for nightly for this propose. We should not use GPG keys in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/arrow/KEYS for this propose. W

Re: Nightly binary packages

2019-02-26 Thread Wes McKinney
I'd be in favor in having nightlies made available in a central place for testing. I think it would help users verify whether bugs have been fixed in master or not. Other ASF projects do make nightlies available with appropriate disclosures that they are not releases: https://jmeter.apache.org/ni