Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-7396
In
"Re: MIME type" on Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:46:30 -0600,
Wes McKinney wrote:
> Shall we create a JIRA issue to memorialize this task?
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 1:16 AM Micah Kornfield wrote:
>>
>> Yeah,
u Kouhei wrote:
>
> > I think that we don't need to wait for 1.0.0. Because we
> > don't change existing format names. ("streaming" and "file"
> > aren't changed.)
> >
> > In
> > "Re: MIME type" on Sun, 1
"streaming" and "file"
> aren't changed.)
>
> In
> "Re: MIME type" on Sun, 1 Dec 2019 20:45:43 -0500,
> Micah Kornfield wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Should we register our MIME types to IANA?
> >
> > Are there any downside
I think that we don't need to wait for 1.0.0. Because we
don't change existing format names. ("streaming" and "file"
aren't changed.)
In
"Re: MIME type" on Sun, 1 Dec 2019 20:45:43 -0500,
Micah Kornfield wrote:
>>
>> Should we regi
register our MIME types to IANA?
>
> It seems that Apache Thrift uses application/x-thift (typo?)
> before Apache Thrift registers these MIME types.
>
> > The application/x-thift media type is currently used to describe multiple
> > formats/protocols. Communications endpoints nee
e format/protocol
> used, so this media type should be used preferentially when it is
> appropriate to do so.
In
"Re: MIME type" on Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:01:54 +0100,
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> If it's not standardized, shouldn't it be prefixed with x-?
>
> e.g
If it's not standardized, shouldn't it be prefixed with x-?
e.g. application/x-apache-arrow-stream
Le 20/11/2019 à 08:29, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
> I would propose:
> application/apache-arrow-stream
> application/apache-arrow-file
>
> I'm not attached to those names but I think there should
I would propose:
application/apache-arrow-stream
application/apache-arrow-file
I'm not attached to those names but I think there should be two different
mime-types, since the formats are not interchangeable.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 10:31 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What MIME type should be
