It doesn't look like I'll have any time to work on this before the 0.9
release so will target for the next one. Wes, it sounds like it could fit
into type annotations, but I'm not quite sure how that will all fit
together so I'll try to follow along in that discussion.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:3
Aside: we should try to settle the discussion we started on the sync
call regarding type annotations -- it may make sense for Map to be an
annotation for List>, but we will need to discuss in some
more detail.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Li Jin wrote:
> Brian,
>
> I think it's ok to impleme
Brian,
I think it's ok to implement MapVector now.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Bryan Cutler wrote:
> I can't make the sync today, but I did want to ask if everyone is ok with
> implementing the MapType in Java, which would add the MapVector class. Is
> this something we can do now or do w
