Re: Docs AI bot

2025-02-24 Thread Nic Crane
OK, great, thanks both for your comments. Given there don't seem to be any overall objections, I'll push ahead with getting this set up and make a PR to integrate it into the docs. We can assess its suitability once it's up there and we've got some data from testing it out. Cheers, Nic On Tue,

Re: Docs AI bot

2025-02-18 Thread Krisztián Szűcs
Hi Nic, I am definitely in favor of the proposal because: - arrow can be confusing due to the various subprojects / specifications / implementations, so context-specific answers could help reduce this confusion - even if the LLM's answer is not entirely accurate, it provides useful pointers to t

Re: Docs AI bot

2025-02-17 Thread Nic Crane
Hi Antoine, > Would Kapa provide us with stats about usage of their service? Yep, I think that would be one of the most valuable things for us. In the docs [1] it shows a UI where we can view the questions which have been asked. > we should check at some point that the provided service is usefu

Re: Docs AI bot

2025-02-17 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hi Nic, Le 17/02/2025 à 12:18, Nic Crane a écrit :> It'd give us useful insights into where we have gaps in our docs where we can improve things, or what are common things that users struggle with. Would Kapa provide us with stats about usage of their service? What do folks think of the i