Either way having a Dockerfile in the project to test with PyPy sounds like
a good idea.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 6:37 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> We can, but we cannot be expected to act if something breaks. So this
> would be wasting CPU resources for little use.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
We can, but we cannot be expected to act if something breaks. So this
would be wasting CPU resources for little use.
Regards
Antoine.
Le 22/10/2020 à 13:33, Krisztián Szűcs a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 1:21 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Niklas,
>>
>> Le 22/10/2020 à 13:16, Nik
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 1:21 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>
> Hi Niklas,
>
> Le 22/10/2020 à 13:16, Niklas B a écrit :
> >
> > Would the arrow project be open to a PR with the above patch, even though
> > it doesn’t give you full PyPy support?
>
> I think that would be ok, but you'll have to provid
Hi Niklas,
Le 22/10/2020 à 13:16, Niklas B a écrit :
>
> Would the arrow project be open to a PR with the above patch, even though it
> doesn’t give you full PyPy support?
I think that would be ok, but you'll have to provide maintenance when
needed, because I think we're unlikely to make PyPy
