Re: [VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process

2025-05-08 Thread Raúl Cumplido
+1 (binding) El jue, 8 may 2025 a las 11:46, Krisztián Szűcs () escribió: > +1 (binding) > > > On 2025. May 8., at 7:53, Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > In > > "[VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process" on Wed, 7 May 2025 > 10:48:40 +0200, > > Raúl Cumplido wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process

2025-05-08 Thread Krisztián Szűcs
+1 (binding) > On 2025. May 8., at 7:53, Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > In > "[VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process" on Wed, 7 May 2025 > 10:48:40 +0200, > Raúl Cumplido wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the >> corres

Re: [VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process

2025-05-07 Thread Sutou Kouhei
+1 (binding) In "[VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process" on Wed, 7 May 2025 10:48:40 +0200, Raúl Cumplido wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the > corresponding release process to its own repository. > > Motivation: > > * We want to

Re: [VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process

2025-05-07 Thread Brian Hulette
+1 On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 8:38 AM Bryce Mecum wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 1:48 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the > > corresponding release process to its own repository. > > > > Motivation: > > > > *

Re: [VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process

2025-05-07 Thread Bryce Mecum
+1 (binding) On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 1:48 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the > corresponding release process to its own repository. > > Motivation: > > * We want to reduce needless major releases to avoid unnecessary user > burden. >

Re: [VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process

2025-05-07 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (binding) Am Mi., 7. Mai 2025 um 15:07 Uhr schrieb Neal Richardson : > > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 5:51 AM David Li wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, May 7, 2025, at 18:08, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > Le 07/05/2025 à 10:48, Raúl Cumplido a é

Re: [VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process

2025-05-07 Thread Neal Richardson
+1 (binding) On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 5:51 AM David Li wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, May 7, 2025, at 18:08, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Le 07/05/2025 à 10:48, Raúl Cumplido a écrit : > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the > >>

Re: [VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process

2025-05-07 Thread Antoine Pitrou
+1 (binding) Le 07/05/2025 à 10:48, Raúl Cumplido a écrit : Hi, I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the corresponding release process to its own repository. Motivation: * We want to reduce needless major releases to avoid unnecessary user burden. * We want to avoid

Re: [VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process

2025-05-07 Thread David Li
+1 (binding) On Wed, May 7, 2025, at 18:08, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > Le 07/05/2025 à 10:48, Raúl Cumplido a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the >> corresponding release process to its own repository. >> >> Motivation: >> >> * We