+1
Bryce Mecum schrieb am Mo., 17. März 2025, 18:14:
> +1
>
> PS: Before we create the repo, we might discuss whether it should be
> called arrow-csharp or arrow-dotnet. I think the latter makes more
> sense.
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 6:13 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would li
+1
PS: Before we create the repo, we might discuss whether it should be
called arrow-csharp or arrow-dotnet. I think the latter makes more
sense.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 6:13 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose splitting C# release process.
>
> Motivation:
>
> * We want to
+1
El lun, 17 mar 2025 a las 4:44, Curt Hagenlocher ()
escribió:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 6:22 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > In <20250317.101329.2226182884160584389@clear-code.com>
> > "[VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:13:29 +0900
> > (JST),
> > S
+1
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 6:22 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> +1
>
> In <20250317.101329.2226182884160584389@clear-code.com>
> "[VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:13:29 +0900
> (JST),
> Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose splitting C# release pr
+1
In <20250317.101329.2226182884160584389@clear-code.com>
"[VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:13:29 +0900 (JST),
Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose splitting C# release process.
>
> Motivation:
>
> * We want to reduce needless major releases be
