+1 (binding)
In
"[VOTE] Increment MetadataVersion in Schema.fbs from V4 to V5 for 1.0.0
release" on Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:42:45 -0500,
Wes McKinney wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed on the mailing list [1], in order to demarcate the
> pre-1.0.0 and post-1.0.0 worlds, and to allow the
> forward-
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:53 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Le 29/06/2020 à 23:42, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > As discussed on the mailing list [1], in order to demarcate the
> > pre-1.0.0 and post-1.0.0 worlds, and to allow the
> > forward-compatibility-pr
+1 (binding)
Le 29/06/2020 à 23:42, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> As discussed on the mailing list [1], in order to demarcate the
> pre-1.0.0 and post-1.0.0 worlds, and to allow the
> forward-compatibility-protection changes we are making to actually
> work (i.e. so that libraries can recogni
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, at 11:11 AM, Neville Dipale wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 06:29, Ben Kietzman wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, 00:25 Wes McKinney wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:49 PM Mica
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 06:29, Ben Kietzman wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, 00:25 Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:49 PM Micah Kornfield
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:43 PM
+1 (non binding)
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, 00:25 Wes McKinney wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:49 PM Micah Kornfield
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:43 PM Wes McKinney
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As discussed on the mailing list [1], in or
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:49 PM Micah Kornfield wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:43 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As discussed on the mailing list [1], in order to demarcate the
> > pre-1.0.0 and post-1.0.0 worlds, and to allow the
> > forward-compat
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:43 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed on the mailing list [1], in order to demarcate the
> pre-1.0.0 and post-1.0.0 worlds, and to allow the
> forward-compatibility-protection changes we are making to actually
> work (i.e. so that libraries can r
