I think the `to_timestamp_*` sounds like a good idea to me
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 3:00 PM Evan Chan wrote:
> Andrew and others,
>
> Thanks for your input.
>
> >
> > 3. For functions (e.g. date_trunc(...)), I think the infrastructure for
> > multiple type signatures exists, we just need implemen
Andrew and others,
Thanks for your input.
>
> 3. For functions (e.g. date_trunc(...)), I think the infrastructure for
> multiple type signatures exists, we just need implementations for different
> resolutions
Sure, we can add more type support in date_trunc() and other functions.
> 4. For con
Hi Evan,
Thank you for writing this up. For anyone else following along, there is
more context / background on [1]
I personally like the "- Add support for functions to work with different
timestamp types" option; In my mind this would effectively mean promoting
the other timestamp types to be "f
