avoiding consolidation of such functionality in the Arrow repos would be in the
best interest of the Arrow ecosystem.
From: dev@arrow.apache.org At: 01/27/23 13:06:20 UTC-5:00To:
dev@arrow.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] C++ query builder/execution API
+1 to what Ian said. I'll also add,
a
whole.
Thanks again for taking a look and sharing your perspective!
From: dev@arrow.apache.org At: 01/27/23 12:10:42 UTC-5:00To:
dev@arrow.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] C++ query builder/execution API
Hi Shoumyo,
This is exciting—thank you for the thoughtfulness you have put into
this prop
+1 to what Ian said. I'll also add, as was brought up in the earlier
pandas API discussion, that a blog post (once you've got something
ready to use) would be a good idea.
> On the other hand, making such an interface readily available alongside
> `libarrow` could increase the adoption of Arrow
Hi Shoumyo,
This is exciting—thank you for the thoughtfulness you have put into
this proposal.
This topic of a C++ dataframe API for Arrow-native engine(s) has come
up in the past [3], but the bulk of the previous discussion about this
predated Substrait. With the Substrait project now quickly ga
