I created
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Columnar+Format+1.0+Milestone
some time ago to try to track the status of different implementations
and various in-flight discussions about columnar format evolution. Can
some others take a look at that and perhaps update some sections?
Hi Jacques,
I think we should have two complete implementations. I don't think having
one feature in C# and Go and another in JavaScript and Rust does justice to
the project goals.
Agree 100%. We may already be in this situation with the DictionaryBatch
"isDelta" flag. I haven't checked the C
I think this makes sense, and it is a good clarification on process. It
might be a good idea to also give a preliminary vote on an existing backlog
of JIRAs so people don't waste time starting PRs if they won't be supported
(or supported via a custom metadata type). I've included a list below
doi
>
> How about "at least two native implementations" instead of
> "Java and C++"? Now, we have multiple native
> implementations:
>
I think we should have two complete implementations. I don't think having
one feature in C# and Go and another in JavaScript and Rust does justice to
the project goals
Hi,
Basically, I agree with the proposal.
> reference implementation/support in Java and C++
How about "at least two native implementations" instead of
"Java and C++"? Now, we have multiple native
implementations:
* C++
* C#
* Go
* Java
* JavaScript
* Rust
So, we can choose at leas
hi Jacques,
I agree with your reasoning. I think it's important to go through the
implementation exercise to make sure we have the details right and
everyone is on board with adding something new (or changing or
deprecating something existing). I also agree with formalizing the
voting process with
