Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 Kind regards, Daniël Op ma 11 dec 2023 om 11:30 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > I agree, flagging new features as experimental is fine but the > existing "spec" is not experimental anymore imho. > > Regards > JB > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 5:39 PM David Li wrote: > > > > Yes, I think we can

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

I agree, flagging new features as experimental is fine but the existing "spec" is not experimental anymore imho. Regards JB On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 5:39 PM David Li wrote: > > Yes, I think we can continue marking new features (like the bulk > ingest/session proposals) as experimental but remove

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 I think Flight SQL is not experimental anymore as it's actually used in production on several players :) Thanks for bringing this, Regards JB On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 6:59 PM David Li wrote: > > Flight SQL has been marked 'experimental' since the beginning. Given that > it's now used by a few

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 10:33 AM Micah Kornfield wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 10:29 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > I agree it is time to "promote" ArrowFlightSQL to the same level as other > > standards in Arrow > > > > Now that it is used widely (we use and count on it too at InfluxDa

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 10:29 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > I agree it is time to "promote" ArrowFlightSQL to the same level as other > standards in Arrow > > Now that it is used widely (we use and count on it too at InfluxData) I > agree it makes sense to remove the experimental label from the over

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

I agree it is time to "promote" ArrowFlightSQL to the same level as other standards in Arrow Now that it is used widely (we use and count on it too at InfluxData) I agree it makes sense to remove the experimental label from the overall spec. It would make sense to leave experimental / caveats on

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

Yes, I think we can continue marking new features (like the bulk ingest/session proposals) as experimental but remove it from anything currently in the spec. On Fri, Dec 8, 2023, at 11:36, Laurent Goujon wrote: > I'm the author of the initial pull request which triggered the discussion. > I was f

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

I'm the author of the initial pull request which triggered the discussion. I was focusing first on the comment in Maven pom.xml files which show up in Maven Central and other places, and which got some people confused about the state of the driver/code. IMHO this would apply to the current Flight/F

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

This applies to mostly existing APIs (e.g. recent additions are still experimental)? Or would it apply to everything going forward? Thanks, Micah On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:25 PM David Li wrote: > Yes, we'd update the docs, the Protobuf definitions, and anything else > referring to Flight SQL as

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

Yes, we'd update the docs, the Protobuf definitions, and anything else referring to Flight SQL as experimental. On Thu, Dec 7, 2023, at 17:14, Joel Lubinitsky wrote: > The message types defined in FlightSql.proto are all marked experimental as > well. Would this include changes to any of those? >

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

The message types defined in FlightSql.proto are all marked experimental as well. Would this include changes to any of those? On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 16:43 Laurent Goujon wrote: > we have been using it with Dremio for a while now, and we consider it > stable > > +1 (not binding) > > Laurent > > O

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

we have been using it with Dremio for a while now, and we consider it stable +1 (not binding) Laurent On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4:52 PM Matt Topol wrote: > +1, I agree with everyone else > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 7:49 PM James Duong > wrote: > > > +1 from me. It's used in a good number of datab

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

+1, I agree with everyone else On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 7:49 PM James Duong wrote: > +1 from me. It's used in a good number of databases now. > > Get Outlook for Android > > From: David Li > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:59:54 AM > To

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 from me. It's used in a good number of databases now. Get Outlook for Android From: David Li Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:59:54 AM To: dev@arrow.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental Flight SQL has been marked

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

At this point we depend on it heavily :) +1 On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4:06 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > +1 > > In <0336b0fb-87d1-4c68-b6dd-727678fe5...@app.fastmail.com> > "[DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental" on Wed, 06 Dec 2023 12:59:54 > -0500, > "David Li" wrote: > > > Flight SQL has been ma

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 In <0336b0fb-87d1-4c68-b6dd-727678fe5...@app.fastmail.com> "[DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental" on Wed, 06 Dec 2023 12:59:54 -0500, "David Li" wrote: > Flight SQL has been marked 'experimental' since the beginning. Given that > it's now used by a few systems for a few years now, should